...............
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Panzer Wrap --- Opinions
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by PanzerJohn View PostWould you expect something thats over 60 years old, has been through a war and carted half way around the world to be so vibrant in colours,clean and perfect?.
Comment
-
Originally posted by B. N. Singer View PostOf course Mr. Davis!
This one I think is made incorrectly.
B. N. Singer
About the wrap, correct materials but as Byron pointed is made incorrectly, personally I don't like buttonholes while a like stamps.
Is the first time a see a nice fake like this..... if is a fake.
I am always carefully with pictures.
LucaSiam fatti cosi!
Comment
-
I can not add too much more about this wrap. IMO certainly a fake/repro, with at least a half a dozen characteristics that are each a show stopper in and of themselves to this one being original.
I have seen maybe 10 to 12 varities of fake wraps on the market since the late 1970s. My guess is that what I have seen represents about 1/2 to 1/3 of the total of the different types that have been produced.
Some of the above have been evolutions of Janke made wraps but most have not been that firm's work. IMO the one on this thread is probably from one of the Baltic Countries or perhaps Poland...I don't know for sure.
What collectors need to keep in mind is that blk PZ uniforms have been faked from the ground up for at least 30 years...probably longer than any other type of German uniform (tunics not caps) and that these fakes can be found with many different details.
This one reminds me at lot of the "Lago Wien" marked ones that were usually full of fine dust that were be offered (often with fake trousers) back in the early to mid 1990s in the 2k range. This one has a different lining and differs in other details...but has the "1000 stitch" collar.
Comment
-
Just trying to learn here. Why (except that numerous fakes have been seen with this characteristic) is the "1000 stitch" collar bad? Did tailoring characteristics change so radically after the war? I know that wartime items were, for the most part, meant to made quickly, with numerous fine points eliminated from the process, but is there documented proof that no wartime uniforms were made like this? Don't mean to be a "bad boy" here, but I would really like to know about solid documentation, if possible. It is very hard for me to comprehend that with literally thousands of tailoring firms spread throughout Germany and the occupied countries, no technique variability is accepted.
Comment
-
PS to my last post: I realize also that most, if not all, of these garments had to be government approved before acceptance and distribution through various
depots. Is the 1000 stitch collar a legitimate ground for rejection of an order or
delivery? Somewhere, there had to have been a checklist of what were (and what were not) acceptable items. Were, by example, collars to be attached "with a minimum of two rows of stitching", so if you had one row, you were rejected, but if you had ten, you were not? I feel certain most suppliers (as in today's world) would have done the absolute minimum to get by, but some must have gone a different route in some areas.
Comment
Users Viewing this Thread
Collapse
There is currently 1 user online. 0 members and 1 guests.
Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.
Comment