Warning: session_start(): open(/var/cpanel/php/sessions/ea-php74/sess_7fa47b5855b12437aaf9aebe055f2b9807f7c7cbc6e2626c, O_RDWR) failed: No space left on device (28) in /home/devwehrmacht/public_html/forums/includes/vb5/frontend/controller/page.php on line 71 Warning: session_start(): Failed to read session data: files (path: /var/cpanel/php/sessions/ea-php74) in /home/devwehrmacht/public_html/forums/includes/vb5/frontend/controller/page.php on line 71 Bwb - Wehrmacht-Awards.com Militaria Forums
BD Publishing

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bwb

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Bwb

    Hi All

    My First Post on WB Forum!

    BWB Your thoughts and opnions if you would be so kind




    http://i279.photobucket.com/albums/k...k/FruntBWB.jpg


    http://i279.photobucket.com/albums/k...VERSEPINUP.jpg


    http://i279.photobucket.com/albums/k...BWBReverse.jpg

    #2
    Justin, nice BWB

    Could you post some pics of the hinge and catch from an oblique angle?

    Mike

    Comment


      #3
      Hi Mike

      Hope this helps

      http://i279.photobucket.com/albums/k...CATCHFLASH.jpg


      http://i279.photobucket.com/albums/k...k/BWBHINGE.jpg

      Comment


        #4
        Justin, thanks for the extra pics. I was hoping that they might help with identifying the maker, but there are several makers who use this setup. That said it is still a nice and good BWB example

        Maybe one of the WB gurus will be able to identify the maker.

        Mike

        Comment


          #5
          No WB gurus

          This WB Was awarded to Karl Zercher on the 1.6.1940 Grossdeutschland

          Comment


            #6
            Justin,
            I've got several possible matches, the shortlist is Deumer (3), S&L (4), Godet (21), Tham (103), Ziemer (111) and Lang (117) my favourite being 117 .
            The shortlist is based on the reverse hardware and some of the die characteristics on the obverse, but it's difficult to see much difference between any of these in terms of the obverse.
            What clinches it for me is an apparent flaw on the RH side of the guard on the RH bayonet. The last two ribs seem to be raised, similar to an image of a badge that's previously been deemed a 117 that I've got in my archives .

            Cheers,

            Neil

            Comment


              #7
              Hi Neil

              Thank you for replying, i guesed from the lack of posts it was a tricky one to nail down

              I can see what you meen by, The last two ribs seem to be raised

              At least you have narrowed it down for me

              Comment

              Users Viewing this Thread

              Collapse

              There is currently 1 user online. 0 members and 1 guests.

              Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.

              Working...
              X