and in response to peter j.'s thoughts,
i have considered that this may be some sort of
1957 version: no hakenkreuz allowed, i presume that the
DRA and '33 DRL were not banned, as they were
pre-existing (prior to third reich), and it was a measure
of a man to retain this award as disabled veteran.
i don't posit this as truth, but just for some consideration.
warlord, all i can say, in having a complete set of DRA's, DRL-33,
and DRL-37, plus all of the SA's, that i have seen or handled
a wide variety of the war woundeds, and this one is right.
BTW, the gentleman i purchased this from in berlin is one
who is one of the VERY FEW people i would buy a piece from
sight unseen. we each have a level of trust, and he has not
lost mine in better than five years of buying from him.
best,
joe
i have considered that this may be some sort of
1957 version: no hakenkreuz allowed, i presume that the
DRA and '33 DRL were not banned, as they were
pre-existing (prior to third reich), and it was a measure
of a man to retain this award as disabled veteran.
i don't posit this as truth, but just for some consideration.
warlord, all i can say, in having a complete set of DRA's, DRL-33,
and DRL-37, plus all of the SA's, that i have seen or handled
a wide variety of the war woundeds, and this one is right.
BTW, the gentleman i purchased this from in berlin is one
who is one of the VERY FEW people i would buy a piece from
sight unseen. we each have a level of trust, and he has not
lost mine in better than five years of buying from him.
best,
joe
Comment