Emil Maurice Grouping

[TxGauleiter]

From what I HEAR, the grouping was sold prior to landing in Hwndershott's hands.

yeah....right.
sounds to me like a smokescreen to keep the original owners name clean...

[David Fettes]

I still feel it would be in Mr Colemans best interest to make a statement. Your reputation is on the line here.

Is this grouping on consignment? (IMO yes due to the Bormann tunic also being with Gary)

Did he sell the grouping to Gary or somebody else before him? (IMO no)

Where is Gary getting his information for the write up? (Guess who)

I am also still waiting for Matthew to explain his post regarding myself.

I would like to point out three things because I feel he wont and was just being a blind troll

1:- Stupidity is still believing that this group is 100% real and direct from the family.

2:- Arrogance in believing that, even after some items were outed many years ago, it was thought that the collecting community would have forgotton all about it by now and it would be safe to offload the lot as 100% genuine.

3:- Vultures swopping down, to grab the said same collector communities cash, as fast as possible, with such panache and daring that one could be mistaken for being Charlie Snyder with a bag full of Eva's panites at an Anne Summers party.



.

[Jo Rivett]

Maurice was making a killing soon after the war shifting "Hitler Memorabilia" - so it seems - In 1953 he pawned Hitlers Typewriter for 25.000 dollah (to an American ). That was a fine sum of cash in 1953.
LINK

[Matthew]

I am also still waiting for Matthew to explain his post regarding myself.

I would like to point out three things because I feel he wont and was just being a blind troll

Let me get this straight detective- you are able to claim that this SS pin is 100% right and original based on this exact picture of the obverse below but somehow think that there are two different Maurice badges and show those pictures to somehow prove your claim?

[Matthew]

Reverses

[Matthew]

Before we go any further and without getting into other pieces of this group- why don't you explain to us why those are in fact two different badges so we can get a picture of what YOUR motives are here. You can omit the purity mark as photoshopped before the verso was published.
Then we can move to discussing the watch.

Looking forward to it.

Matt

[Matthew]

While we're on the subject of the badge in question: your post titled 'more issues' you circled the Fuess mark presumably showing us an issue of sorts. Being a 'blind troll' as you put it- maybe you can also explain what you were getting at there.
Thanks.

Matt

[David Fettes]

you are able to claim that this SS pin is 100% right and original based on this exact picture of the obverse

Dear Mr Matt, SS pin has nothing to do with this thread, maybe you would like to either start a new one or post this in the correct place.

somehow think that there are two different Maurice badges and show those pictures to somehow prove your claim?

I never said they were (see page 15 post 220)

All I said was (again page 15 post 223) "From what I can gather Bob Coleman's badge is one the left, the one on the right was sold by Helmut Weitze"
This was in refernce to the link posted by Richard V.

so we can get a picture of what YOUR motives are here

The truth would be nice, wouldnt you agree?


With regard to the Fuess mark in my photo (many thanks for showing it again, saves me from reposting it), well to me there looks to be a wider gap between the J. and the F of Fuess, maybe a trick of the light when the photo was taken. I have taken your photo and tried to look closer (as it is a better example then the one I had.) Ummm still think there is a bigger gap then on the Hess and Singer badges.

Any input on the six other differences?


.

[Matthew]

Stupidity, Arrogance, Vulturism.

Ummm still think there is a bigger gap then on the Hess and Singer badges.

Any input on the six other differences?


.

Bigger gap than on other badges. Genius.
Guess the excuse of no dot after JOS dissipated with new pics I posted so have to find something else in a hurry.

Six other differences on hand engraved badges? Just that. Hand engraved. Possibly by more than one person.

[Matthew]

I never said they were (see page 15 post 220)

All I said was (again page 15 post 223) "From what I can gather Bob Coleman's badge is one the left, the one on the right was sold by Helmut Weitze"
This was in refernce to the link posted by Richard V.

If you're this deep you should probably stop digging.

If you thought there was only one then by default it would have to be the same badge- Coleman's as sold by Weitze.
Not Coleman's on the left and the other as sold by Weitze on the right.

[Matthew]

Dear Mr Matt, SS pin has nothing to do with this thread, maybe you would like to either start a new one or post this in the correct place.

You're right. It has nothing to do with an SS pin. I posted it to illustrate the point of you passing judgement without elementary info on the item- including what the piece looks like. There was no 'maybe', 'could be', 'looks like'. You called it 100% original. Only two kinds of people can make a judgement like that- clairvoyants and idiots.
Can you see objects beyond the range of natural vision? Because if you can't, we're down to only one possibility..

[Jo Rivett]

I`d suggest to anyone who wants to see this thread stay open, to put Matthew on your ignore list, or at the very least, dont fall for his baiting - ignore him!. He is a Shill for Coleman, and has been thumbing-up this phony group for years on multiple forums.
The evidence is clear, his recent posts contain insults and baiting, and nothing more.

1. Let me get this straight detective
2. Bigger gap than on other badges. Genius.
3. If you're this deep you should probably stop digging.
4. clairvoyants and idiots.

The objective here, is to get this thread locked so it will, as it was supposed to a few months ago by being unpinned, go away.

[Matthew]

And this is why I did not partake earlier on.

[David Fettes]

Coleman's as sold by Weitze.

if this is correct then that badge did NOT come direct from the family did it.


As for the SS pin (which you brought up again even though you agreed it had nothing to do with the thread) I did not call it original by looking at the front.
I called it original by looking at the back of it. (assuming it was the 3 number type 1 square O pin no 201)

And yes I did make a mistake in saying J., should have said JOS. Thank you for pointing that out.

p.s. I am not a clairvoyant or an idiot.

[Matthew]

if this is correct then that badge did NOT come direct from the family did it.

Are you saying Coleman claimed he got it directly from the family?