Announcement

**voelender** · 10-03-2011, 11:57 PM

And two close-up pictures.

Attached Files

**Joe Slavick** · 10-04-2011, 02:20 AM

Marcel:

For me, I actually like the look of the document--BUT--an issue immediately jumped out at me as an item of concern. Why would there be a need to produce a handmade document for this timeframe and area? That kinda gives me angst about the document.

The unit would not have been remote or detached, supplies would have been uninterupted and available and the rear-echelon would have always been nearby. All of this means real EK1s and issued award documents would probably have been readily available.

Of course just my opinion.

Joe

**hucks216** · 10-04-2011, 03:50 AM

Well the signature does match that of Erwin Vierow. According to Axis Biographical Research he was a Generalmajor until 1st August 1940 and on that date became commander of 9 Inf.Division but there is always the chance that he received his promotion slightly earlier.
I think a home made example could of been issued if the unit hadn't ordered enough examples of the citation originally and made their own while waiting for more to arrive. I have a few Western Campaign EK citations and some are dated into August, and in one case December, 1940 which would indicate a backlog.

**Brian R** · 10-04-2011, 05:14 AM

Unusual, but interesting. The signer, signature and unit match up - my guts says its good.

**Eric JB** · 10-04-2011, 09:29 AM

Marcel,

My first impression says that the document is a good one.

Is the Iron Cross image at the top, done by hand too, or printed ?

yours friendly

Eric-Jan

**Simon O.** · 10-04-2011, 10:43 AM

I like it, think again about the date, just a week after the armistice, the German army had advanced incredibly quickly, so fast their logistical tail struggled to keep up. It's hardly surprising something like EK award documents weren't Nr.1 priority to get to the troops.

I wonder what's behind this award as an EKI this early to someone like a sani of a pionier bataillon may hint at quite a story.

**VtwinVince** · 10-04-2011, 01:24 PM

'Befehlshaber' is spelled wrong.

**Eric JB** · 10-04-2011, 02:10 PM

Originally posted by VtwinVince View Post

'Befehlshaber' is spelled wrong.

you are right about that.

sometimes that happens when someone tries to write it as nice as possible and doing letter by letter.

yours friendly

Eric-Jan

**voelender** · 10-04-2011, 02:20 PM

Thanks for your reply so far.
It sounds an interesting piece so far.

As far as I can see the Iron cross on the top is printed.

And indeed the word what supose to be "Befehlshabers" is on the urkunde "Befehshabers " just an error????

**Eric JB** · 10-04-2011, 02:27 PM

Hi Marcel,

Yes I thought that the Iron Cross was printed, compared to the ones printed on the official award documents for the EK.2 and EK.1.
But better to know it for sure by asking you about it.

I think that the missing "l" is just an error.

yours friendly

Eric-Jan

**Hank C.** · 10-04-2011, 09:51 PM

I remember seeing a printed version of an EK document that spelled out "Fuherer" (that was - yes - original). So it's not inconceivable that a hand-made doc like this would have a misspelling. By the time somebody noticed and said "Oh scheisse..." it was probably signed and too late.

best
hank

**voelender** · 10-04-2011, 11:52 PM

It sounds all pretty positive. Thanks so far.

Is this type of urkundes a bit rare so worthed to keep ??

**Brian R** · 10-05-2011, 05:31 AM

To me, basically all EK documents are worth keeping. This doc is uncommon in some ways but I wouldnt necessarily think that it would command a significant premium.

Announcement

early URKUNDE (June 1940) EK-1 ,handmade !!!!! Opinions please

early URKUNDE (June 1940) EK-1 ,handmade !!!!! Opinions please

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Users Viewing this Thread