SS-EK1 document

[robertoroni]

I would like be firmly convinced,if this document is original.It has been in discussion here:
http://dev.wehrmacht-awards.com/foru...d.php?t=353416

[robertoroni]

Signature

[robertoroni]

Stamp

[robertoroni]

Text

[robertoroni]

I am excusing myself.I missed section.
I hope it will still be fine.

[Simon O.]

The others are scanned copies of originals (which you knew anyway but didn't say so until it was pointed out to you) why do you think this one isn't?

[Hundestaffel]

Simon:

No point in wasting your time or effort on this CRAP.

"Hundestaffel"

[Frontalschaden]

Hello

In October 1944, Lammerding was SS-Gruppenführer, so why should he sign in November with the lower rank of SS-Brigadeführer ?????


Best regards, Fronti

[max history]

Hello

In October 1944, Lammerding was SS-Gruppenführer, so why should he sign in November with the lower rank of SS-Brigadeführer ?????


Best regards, Fronti

Sorry, but this is not correct. Lammerding is listed in the 9 Nov 1944 SS-DAL as SS-Brigadeführer und Generalmajor der Waffen-SS.

Simon:

No point in wasting your time or effort on this CRAP.

"Hundestaffel"

Please give your reasons for this statement. Are you referring to the documents or the thread?

Many thanks,
Max.

[Simon O.]

Max

These are scanned copies of originals, the others were quite easy to spot when better pictures were put up but the EKI is the less obvious of the lot. One of those times when an in hand inspection would be better than photos but the point is the grouping has been discredited, the poster has tried to sell the group on GCA and the way he has gone forward with this group has only left himself open to suspiscion as to his motives.

[andrewb]

I would be very careful with this one. In fact I would give it a miss.
See here.

http://dev.wehrmacht-awards.com/foru...d.php?t=325114

Same date and almost same unit and that is a fake doc.

Here is an original Lammerding signature from my collection.

Regards,
AB.

[max history]

Max

These are scanned copies of originals, the others were quite easy to spot when better pictures were put up but the EKI is the less obvious of the lot. One of those times when an in hand inspection would be better than photos but the point is the grouping has been discredited, the poster has tried to sell the group on GCA and the way he has gone forward with this group has only left himself open to suspiscion as to his motives.

Thanks Simon, I see your point now, having missed all the previous discussions.
Max.

[max history]

I would be very careful with this one. In fact I would give it a miss.
See here.


Here is an original Lammerding signature from my collection.

Regards,
AB.

Andrew,
How sure are you that your example is genuine? Without the benefit of seeing your entire document, both the Lammerding and Hausser signatures appear very unstable to me. They both look as if they have been nervously written by unsteady hand(s). Maybe a sight of the document in its entirety will dispel my doubts?
Regards,
Max.

[Hundestaffel]

QUOTE: Please give your reasons for this statement. Are you referring to the documents or the thread?

Many thanks,
Max.

ANSWER: BOTH.

"Hundestaffel"

[robertoroni]

I can`t just believe,that these documents are one ****.Well,this is found out now.These documents do not apply anything.