Gwl - 1
-
-
Gwl - 2 -
Gwl - 3Comment
-
Gwl - 4Comment
-
Unmarked - 1Comment
-
Unmarked - 2Comment
-
Unmarked - 3Comment
-
Hey Dai, the news on these isn't the best IMHO...Are you using the same supplier (as per the KM badges discussed the other day?)
Cheers, S
Last edited by Steve P; 10-03-2009, 01:27 AM.Cheers, Steve
----------------------------------------------------------------
"Next to a battle lost, the saddest thing is a battle won." Arthur Wellesley — Duke of WellingtonComment
-
Explain.....Originally posted by Steve P View PostHey Dai, the news on these isn't the best IMHO...Are you using the same supplier (as per the KM badges discussed the other day?) Cheers, S
Dai I think the unmarked one is good, but I have my doubts about the GWL ( the pitting on the back, and the finnish has me concerned). It still could be good,....... but lets wait to here what the experts have to sayLast edited by mike y; 10-03-2009, 07:04 AM.Comment
-
Hello guys, I think that this is the best conditioned GWL LW GAB that I've ever seen- original, the second one- I don't like the eagle at all, but am not sure about it
RegardsComment
-
Hi Mike,
I'm not surte which bit you are asking me to explain so here goes...I was referring to the previous thread recently and one other as well...
http://dev.wehrmacht-awards.com/foru...d.php?t=382992
Hi again Dai,
If I had to say at a push I think the Wegerhoff is most likely to be original but I have a few issues with the obverse...the reverse looks ok...
The unmarked badge is not original IMO...But as Mike says expert opinion is best mate, no wish to rain on your parade so to speak...just my humble opine! Not too tied to it mate so best of it.... cheers,
SCheers, Steve
----------------------------------------------------------------
"Next to a battle lost, the saddest thing is a battle won." Arthur Wellesley — Duke of WellingtonComment
-
I don't like this GWL which has strange reverse....especially rivets.
Indy
i'm not sure about unmarked one.........i don't have an unmarked GAB on my hand.Last edited by Indy; 10-03-2009, 08:35 AM.Comment
-
Hi Lubo,
...I was writing my last post below when you came into this thread mate...
Well! you could be write on the GWL, though I am very suspect on the unmarked badge as a reproduction, as you say the eagle is very suspect as are a couple of other features IMO...
As Mike says let's hear from others and we may get some clearer views! We could all be proven wrong huh! The important thing is to enjoy the discussion and learn from the discourse...opinions are just that and I'm sure we are all here to help & learn!
Cheers,
SCheers, Steve
----------------------------------------------------------------
"Next to a battle lost, the saddest thing is a battle won." Arthur Wellesley — Duke of WellingtonComment
-
Hey Indy,
This one's got me intrigued now...What do you think is the issue with the rivets mate...I am looking at a (verified) GWL and I see that the rivets possibly look a little less defined and deep, but I actually thought they may have been ok? I was more concerned with the Obverse details seeming more clinical than an original rather than having so much an issue with the reverse...Let us know your thoughts?
Cheers again, S
Cheers, Steve
----------------------------------------------------------------
"Next to a battle lost, the saddest thing is a battle won." Arthur Wellesley — Duke of WellingtonComment
-
The GWL is never ever original. The unmarked is a good one.
DanielComment
Comment