Hi what do you guys think about this badge?? Thanks in advance David R.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
sub badge opinions
Collapse
X
-
David, I disagree, this is one of the badges with the slightly larger rudder than what is commonly seen. Unfortunately no one has ever been able to attribute the maker of these badges. There are a couple of items for a badge of this manufacturer that I can’t see in your photo. First is that they usually have a fairly defined propeller. The second is a rounded top for the hinge pin. If your badge has these attributes, IMHO it's an original piece.Ignored Due To Invisibility.
Comment
-
Well it would´nt be one that I would want in my collection.
Is that corrosion on the front of the hull were it leaves the wreath?
The funny red colour looks like attempted ageing that does´nt really work.
The badly cut out cannon and flag are also pretty ugly.
Are there shear marks on the side of the badge, some side shots might help.
SkipLOOKING FOR ALL ITEMS CONNECTED TO HERBERT SCHOB.
Comment
-
Gordon Williamson
David
Looks like a good original piece to me. I have an identical piece, mint firegilded tombak, but with slightly differing hinge, but the die characteristics identical - head of eagle, rudder of sub, deck gun, flag etc. Mine belonged to Oberleutnant Heinrich Niemeyer, commander of U-547.
In my opinion a far nicer badge than the Schwerin.
Comment
-
Gordens looks pretty much the same from the front but from the back you can see that the bottom cutout is totally different.
Hinge and catch are also totally different, although this is not disqualifying in itself. The flag and canon are also a little different.
Facit, could be the same badge, but Gordens looks alround better. I still don´t like that bit were the front hull leaves the wreath either.
SkipLOOKING FOR ALL ITEMS CONNECTED TO HERBERT SCHOB.
Comment
-
Dear Gordon,
I tend to agree with Skip. The original badge shown by Gordon probably served as basis for the one schown by David.
Gordon the one you posted shows al the finishing qualities one would expect and looks very homogeneous.
I have never seen a badge where the eagles head is just an imprint and all the surrounding material is still there. If it is original it probably never reached the final production stage.
Kind Regards
Philippe
Comment
-
Hi,
I have a similar badge to David's. It's been posted before, more than once, with mixed response. If it's a repro, fine, but if so it's not a recent one.
Gordon, if your badge is not vaulted, could you please provide some measurements? I'll get mine out later and do the same. If one "served as the basis" for the other as Philippe has suggested (I'm assuming casting here) then my example and David's example should be smaller than Gordons.
Regards
Mike KRegards
Mike
Evaluate the item, not the story and not the seller's reputation!
If you PM/contact me without the courtesy of using your first name, please don't be offended if I politely ignore you!
Comment
-
Hi guys,
Just one other thought. As skip mentioned the cut out starting at the front of the Hull realy cuts in to the wreath. Could it be possible that due to that mistake the piece was rejected by QC an nobody even bothered to finish it, this also could explain the residue around the head.
Like I said, just a thought
Philippe
Comment
-
Gordon Williamson
-
Philippe could be correct. While the condition could be better, I still believe this to be an original badge. That being said, there is something wrong where the bow of the boat crashed into the wreath. Mine doesn't show this flaw. It does however have the same pin and catch assembly with the exception of the round head hinge pin.Ignored Due To Invisibility.
Comment
-
uboat badge
I had one of these badges from the old brigade. with the exact type of flag and eagle you can view pics at
http://daggers.infopop.net/2/OpenTop...3&m=7443091396
look at the eagles legs they go straight down with no bump for the tallons. the head is the same the flag is the same. they look like the same maker to me.
Comment
Users Viewing this Thread
Collapse
There is currently 0 user online. 0 members and 0 guests.
Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.
Comment