MilitaryStockholm

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Panzerkampfabzeichen EZ 25 + ISA @ HELP

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by PKAliebhaber View Post
    Hello Norm!

    Thanks for youre post!
    "Rettenmaier-attributed" i can live with this!!! Others can also=???
    Thanks for the Links! I dont like the "mystery Box" at all, but its just my opinion, hopefully nobody will delete my post here

    cheers!
    I want not make politic in our hobby and try to be diplomatic. For me personal was the find from Giel interesting.

    Comment


      #32
      Hi Atomic,

      good statement ... it's always the question what we are doing out of such findings.
      Best regards, Andreas

      ______
      The Wound Badge of 1939
      www.vwa1939.com
      The Iron Cross of 1939- out now!!! Place your orders at:
      www.ek1939.com

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by Atomic View Post
        I want not make politic in our hobby and try to be diplomatic. For me personal was the find from Giel interesting.
        Thanks Joe. Your considerate input is much appreciated.

        I sincerely wish everyone could adopt a less combative approach to discussion for the sake of our interesting hobby.

        No one has ever suggested home workers didn't exist -- just the opposite, that is interesting information accepted by the collecting community based upon Basti and Andreas' research and further supported by Joe's discussion with Rettenmaier's grandson.

        Equally, it's apparent that not all firms used the same home workers and that not every badge made by every firm was assembled exclusively by home workers. As a result patterns of reverse setups emerge for different makers. We clearly see exclusive patterns of some reverse setups on maker marked KM badges, so it logically follows that patterns can be seen on unmarked badges as well, and sometimes correlated to other marked products by some makers.

        In other words, everyone's research and observations are important and valued in this hobby to piece together useful theories with appropriate terminology. Discussion about that terminology need not get so heated, and it's important to post with the appropriate respect to one another. I thank Joe for setting the right example for us all.

        Best regards,
        ---Norm

        Comment

        Users Viewing this Thread

        Collapse

        There is currently 0 user online. 0 members and 0 guests.

        Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.

        Working...
        X