Hello guys i have me views, could you tell me what you think of this IAB and PAB. Take a really good look at them.
regards Adam
IMG_0254.JPG
regards Adam
IMG_0254.JPG
-
-
[ATTACH]969792[/ATTACH] -
[ATTACH]969794[/ATTACH]Comment
-
[ATTACH]969795[/ATTACH]Comment
-
[ATTACH]969797[/ATTACH]Comment
-
[ATTACH]969799[/ATTACH]Comment
-
Both look ok to me.pseudo-expertComment
-
please Don tell me why .Originally posted by Don Doering View Post
Because I do not want these 2 in my collection .Comment
-
Double post ........... Oh DearComment
-
tripple post !!!Comment
-
The Weidmann PAB doesn't quite look right to me, it might just be wear and tear; but the maker mark looks distorted, also the hinge is not what I would expect, also the overall condition of the rear.
MikeComment
-
Im with Mike on this one I too dont like the back of the PAB looks messeyComment
-
keep the thoughts coming guys.
AdamComment
-
by the way, both from trusted forum members. I have to say know that I am building up more of a knowledge, that these are utter crap. I just want people to post what they think. Then I will probarly have a struggle to get my money back.
regards AdamComment
-
Hi Adam......
......While a in-hand inspection is normaly the best way to make a accurate decision on any badge, I don't see any major bell-ringing problems with either badge.
The IAB looks like a late-war zincer with silver wash that is classified(here anyway) as the 'deformed leaf' variety.
The Weidmann looks prety much the same. I would personally expect to see that type of hinge set-up. I don't see a issue with the mm either.
However, much larger images combined with weights and measurements could be the deciding factor in your determining whether to keep them or not. As I have previously stated, a in-hand inspection would really make the difference.
Hope that this helps you some.
Comment
Comment