What do you think?

[A H]

Hello guys i have me views, could you tell me what you think of this IAB and PAB. Take a really good look at them.

regards Adam

IMG_0254.JPG

[A H]

[ATTACH]969792[/ATTACH]

[A H]

[ATTACH]969794[/ATTACH]

[A H]

[ATTACH]969795[/ATTACH]

[A H]

[ATTACH]969797[/ATTACH]

[A H]

[ATTACH]969799[/ATTACH]

[Don D.]

Both look ok to me.

[WenRan]

Both look ok to me.

please Don tell me why .

Because I do not want these 2 in my collection .

[WenRan]

Double post ........... Oh Dear

[WenRan]

tripple post !!!

[fugpaw]

The Weidmann PAB doesn't quite look right to me, it might just be wear and tear; but the maker mark looks distorted, also the hinge is not what I would expect, also the overall condition of the rear.

Mike

[derrydingle]

Im with Mike on this one I too dont like the back of the PAB looks messey

[A H]

keep the thoughts coming guys.

Adam

[A H]

by the way, both from trusted forum members. I have to say know that I am building up more of a knowledge, that these are utter crap. I just want people to post what they think. Then I will probarly have a struggle to get my money back.

regards Adam

[Bruce Simcox]

Hi Adam......

......While a in-hand inspection is normaly the best way to make a accurate decision on any badge, I don't see any major bell-ringing problems with either badge.

The IAB looks like a late-war zincer with silver wash that is classified(here anyway) as the 'deformed leaf' variety.

The Weidmann looks prety much the same. I would personally expect to see that type of hinge set-up. I don't see a issue with the mm either.

However, much larger images combined with weights and measurements could be the deciding factor in your determining whether to keep them or not. As I have previously stated, a in-hand inspection would really make the difference.

Hope that this helps you some.