Another addition to the ever increasing list of reasons why I could entertain doubts about this one is that they have recently started appearing in extremely questionable "archaeological" digs, along with other SS items which have been deemed fake by experts in such matters. eg. two of these were "ground dug" a couple of years ago, along with an example of the bubble textured SS 4 year medal, which is notorious for being 'planted' in various battlefield areas. Both of the aforementioned are incredibly well made, both are die struck and both can be found with the same erratic mixture of 'Type I' & 'Type II' eyelets as well as both teardrop and circular jump rings.
Here is a quick summary of the other main points that I have concerns about:
. Spindly lettering lacking in style
. Bone shaped serifs
. Rounded Runes (reverse)
. Excessively dished faces
. Excessively high relief (a result of the above)
. Lack of any side protruding leaves to the wreath
Here is a quick summary of the other main points that I have concerns about:
. Spindly lettering lacking in style
. Bone shaped serifs
. Rounded Runes (reverse)
. Excessively dished faces
. Excessively high relief (a result of the above)
. Lack of any side protruding leaves to the wreath
Comment