Yes.... words ...words.....
Some time - one sharp photo spoke more than 100 words )))))
Some time - one sharp photo spoke more than 100 words )))))
-
-
Hey Bill,
I remember when you found all those tags and other items. Of course you were always making such discoveries. I also enjoyed searching the construction sites on the kasernes. I was never as lucky as you though. I mostly found old bottles, fragments of dishes, and a few panzerfaust tubes. Well things are slowly coming together in our new home in SA. It's almost liveable. Now I hear to Oklahoma next week to help move my mom.
JimComment
-
Hey Jim,
That's right you got to see those finds. I remember you finding those Panzerfaust tubes on Funari....I think I went was with you when you pulled them out where they were digging a communications trench next to one of the buildings. I was always on the lookout for construction sites on the Kasernes because something always popped out of the ground. I'm sure there is much more to be found but unfortunately the bases in our old stomping grounds were turned over to the German Government.
I figure you and Deb were feverishly working on organizing your new home up in SA. Let me know when the house warming party is going to take place so you can invite the gang over. Is your Mom moving in with you in SA or with your sister out in OK. Send me an email as this really isn't the place to discuss. You must be getting close to the release of your next book.
Talk later and Hi to Deb and the burritos!
Bill
Originally posted by djpool View PostComment
-
So ,, you will not post any detailed pics ,,, Out of principle ?
Tough to understand your logic here, you obviously want to show them off, but only at a distance ,,, Ooook.Comment
-
I've already stated my reason....I didn't post them to get opinion on whether the were real or not which is what Mr. Pitomnik had initially stated and then contradicted himself by saying the opposite. Others chimed in saying they were genuine and several friends who are members here verified that. My friend Jim was with me when I discovered them. I didn't solicit their opinions. I just wanted to relate on how I found them and I'm pretty sure others have found such treasures on Kasernes. Logic and principle has nothing to do with it but a simple decision (mine) not to show detailed close up photos of them does so Why is it so hard to understand? Accept it!! life goes on OK.
Originally posted by eldenwaff View PostComment
-
Please, tell me - "what Mr. Pitomnik had initially stated and then contradicted himself by saying the opposite." ???Originally posted by W Petz View Post
You show bad photo , and when i ask show detail - you started to be indignant and call witnesses))))) To tell histories not concerning to a theme!)))) and it was simply necessary 1-2 photos for end of dispute!
So people which act is what to hide.
And it not only my opinion !Comment
-
If photos of items are going to be posted, it would be more usefull and educational for quality, usable, readable photos to be posted. That is what the forum is about. As it stands now, this thread is a "war story", with several insiders who already know chiming in to verify it. For the other 99.9% of the forum the thread is useless.
Pitomnik raises what are apparently very valid points, that probably have a just as valid (and educational) explanation. But this explanation can not be found with the information posted so far.
JLComment
-
First of all I did not call witnesses...my friends are members on WAF. The chimed in as they saw my thread.
Here is what you stated
Quote: Can you post photos of each dogtag ?
I have some doubt .....
This is telling me you some doubt of originality of the ID Tags
Then after my friend Jim Haley spoke up that he was there you stated
Mr. Petz!
I did not speak - " yours dogtags fake! "
This is a contradiction from what you said that you had doubts i.e. originality of the ID tags
As far as your statement "Only has asked 1-2 good photos or scans !
your original request said: Can you post photos of each dogtag ?
That is also a contradiction! You plainly want to antagonize me and bully me into posting detailed photos and I've clearly stated I will not. I did not seek opinions and there is no dispute as far as originality. I know they are real and my friend who happened to be there saw it for himself. I'm not here to deceive or to hide anything it is you trying to portray me as intending to do so. Again I say I have the right to say no...so you have your answer. end of story.
If desire to continue...I will ask the Moderator to close this thread as I see it is going no where as you already have my answer.
Have a great day
Bill Petz
Originally posted by Pitomnik View PostComment
-
Ohhhh !))))Originally posted by W Petz View Post
"Doubs" and "Fake" - for you Identical value?
I never wished you bad! Also did not change the opinion!
I have only asked a photo - because dogtags strange!
But you have given up - without logic and explanations!))))))
You can write as much as necessary - " I have personally found ", " many people saw it ")) But it not 100 % a guarantee.
There are many examples - when people "found" in presence witnesses..... But after it it appeared a forgery.
Considering yours not desire to show a photo - I continue to consider your digtags at least "Doubts"!
Can ask to close a moderator " not a convenient thread "!)))))Last edited by Pitomnik; 02-26-2016, 12:21 PM.Comment
-
So since my honesty and integrity is being challenged and I assure you I do not tell "War Stories" Here is a scan of eight of the ID Tags in question.Comment
-
Many thanks for scan !
But picture size - 74 Kb for 8 dogtags ....... Not better than a photo from the first post .
Can you made NORMAL scan or photo (like i show you ) ?
And both side please .Comment
-
I will honor your request for the two scans that you requested earlier. Let me know which two and I will scan them.
Originally posted by Pitomnik View PostComment
-
Thanks ! ( i ask 3 scans !!! but no problem, 2 ...OK , only please - not 50-70 Kb))))Originally posted by W Petz View Post
Both side 2 this tags.
Thanks.Comment
-
I believe you need to re-read what you requested on page 10 & 21 where you stated 1 - 2 scans...not three. I would also like to point out one of the tags you mainly doubted and criticized was the rostfrei 263 tag and I believe the reason for all this doubt that you have. So as requested here is the first of two scans for the tags you selected.
Originally posted by Pitomnik View PostComment
-
Tag 2Comment
Comment