Roger
Not trying to rip it apart, but not being listed as Rk recipient is plausible in February of 45 but being awarded in March of 43 as a holder of the Dkig there was a good two years of war left for records to "catch up" .
Since you don’t seem disappointed that the entries are suspect for the later awards I am hoping you didn’t pay a Knightcross premium on this group and if the hand the wrote the Rk entries is the same that put in the confirmed kills in the Wp that can be dismissed as well. It may not have been Lange at all doing it post war but more likely a faker attempting to sex it up to make it more valuable to sell.
I feel that since the seller may have misrepresented the group to you I think what ever you signed not to share information is null and void at this point .If it was me i would want to find the truth by any means necessary
Ian
Not trying to rip it apart, but not being listed as Rk recipient is plausible in February of 45 but being awarded in March of 43 as a holder of the Dkig there was a good two years of war left for records to "catch up" .
Since you don’t seem disappointed that the entries are suspect for the later awards I am hoping you didn’t pay a Knightcross premium on this group and if the hand the wrote the Rk entries is the same that put in the confirmed kills in the Wp that can be dismissed as well. It may not have been Lange at all doing it post war but more likely a faker attempting to sex it up to make it more valuable to sell.
I feel that since the seller may have misrepresented the group to you I think what ever you signed not to share information is null and void at this point .If it was me i would want to find the truth by any means necessary
Ian
Comment