Dear David, thank you for the great scan (you have to become an association member to be able to post scans by the way).
Now the question is: why it had to be written as <b>Pak 36/37</b>. I had thought that there were two models (or three, 35,36,37), and a slash was used to mean interchangability. But looking at the entry in that Wehrpass, I tend to dream that the official designation was <b>Pak 36</b> and 37 was added to mean 3,7 cm (NO <i>3,7cm Pak 36/37</i> but just <i>Pak 36/37</i> in the book). Of course this does not explain 35/36, I know. What are your other findings Simon?
Now the question is: why it had to be written as <b>Pak 36/37</b>. I had thought that there were two models (or three, 35,36,37), and a slash was used to mean interchangability. But looking at the entry in that Wehrpass, I tend to dream that the official designation was <b>Pak 36</b> and 37 was added to mean 3,7 cm (NO <i>3,7cm Pak 36/37</i> but just <i>Pak 36/37</i> in the book). Of course this does not explain 35/36, I know. What are your other findings Simon?
Comment