Originally posted by Dave Kane
- is it clear that the minute flaws are NOT a result of the pantograph copying process, and
- if no: how did they come into existence?
- if yes: why not again the second time around?
But as I said earlier numerous times: It does not matter, the result is the same.
And to answer Tom's fear about perfect Juncker copies. I don't think this can happen if one does not have the 5:1 model (under the assumption that the minute flaws are part of this model). And, in addition, as Dave rightly pointed out earlier: It takes more then just the dies. There are still a lot of other things to consider.
Perfect Juncker (or whatever maker) copies from Latvia or from wherever? I absolutely don't think so! No way!
Dietrich
Comment