Dietrich - S&L RK???

[Marc Garlasco]

Dietrich,
Dude - when is the article on the S&L RK coming out? I have a dog in this fight and I can't wait to get this party started!
Marc

[Dietrich Maerz]

Hi Marc,

understand you anxiety! Seba has the article right now and agreed to publish on the site. I don't know exactly when this will happen.

Dietrich

[Dave Kane]

Dietrich.....how about a little 'tease'?

[Dietrich Maerz]

How about this. The pictures DOES NOT show dirt, but rather a die flaw which is the identification of the Typ A die from S&L and cannot be found on Type B...

Dietrich

[George Stimson]

Another tease

I found the revelation about the lower 3 o'clock arm beading on the "935/4" version to be most interesting!

[Skipper Greenwade]

I. too, have a cross that has gone under Dietrich's 'scope and can't wait to see the article publiied here. What I've seen is interesting, to say the least - remarkable research by someone with a helluva lot more patience than I have!

Skip

[Marc Garlasco]

Dietrich - when will you reveal the "tool?"
Marc

[tom hansen]

Just a few areas to look at on your S&L, Marc

1. The junction of the 12 oclock and 9 oclock arms

[tom hansen]

2. The junction of the 12 oclock and 3 oclock arms

These areas were touched upon in another thread "more S&L die flaws", but this was a brief discussion of these flaws.

[Dietrich Maerz]

Dietrich - when will you reveal the "tool?"
Marc

It's up to Seba right now. I'm also working on the German version of the article and hope to have it ready to be published in Germany by the middle of next week.

Dietrich

[Brian S]

Are secrets from the article being spilled out before being published...not exactly cricket.

[Dave Kane]

Brian, no...and please don't put a negative spin on this!!!

I understand that you wouln't contribute so please let this evolve

This is going to be based on items 'in hand' not just old doctored pictures and surely no assertions of a "new" something or other in town!

[tom hansen]

Brian, no...and please don't put a negative spin on this!!!

I understand that you wouln't contribute so please let this evolve

This is going to be based on items 'in hand' not just old doctored pictures and surely no assertions of a "new" something or other in town!

Sorry- No attmept to reveal anything. I do not know the nature of Diertich's report on S&L RKs or any details regarding analysis or conclusions but I would imagine it will be a comprehensive review of the crosses of different types of S&Ls and answer questions regarding these pieces. The old thread on "more S&L die flaws" just mentioned these particular flaws and just showed where they were. The primary focus there was to see if others had similar flaws in the same area.

[Brian S]

Brian, no...and please don't put a negative spin on this!!!

I understand that you wouln't contribute so please let this evolve

This is going to be based on items 'in hand' not just old doctored pictures and surely no assertions of a "new" something or other in town!

Gee Dave, who's being negative here.

[Brian S]

The primary focus there was to see if others had similar flaws in the same area.

Sorry, I thought the focus was to get Dietrich's article out for publication.