It means that I suspect the 800 mark was added after construction
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Junker RK for Review
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Tony T-S View PostIt means that I suspect the 800 mark was added after construction
Do we know when in the construction process the stamps were 'normally' added? Were they not all added after construction? From reviewing other crosses, it does appear that the placement of the stamping varies a bit on each example. Does a low stamping somehow indicate something special?
Comment
-
Originally posted by ekhunter View PostMaybe I should of clarified my comment. As it’s not a “Junker” as claimed, or maybe it is. I said it appears to be a S&L micro 800, what I should of said was it’s trying to appear as a micro 800 as Juncker did not mark their RK’s with a micro 800 stamp. Maybe it was added to the frame by someone after the fact, but it could be one of the “high end” fakes. I don’t know these new fakes that well. Not sure on this one but the micro 800 stamp is wrong on a Juncker, and it does appear micro to me. I would be curious to hear others opinions.
Comment
-
Originally posted by D. Wyatt View PostLooking at this thing again, and now knowing the core is non-magnetic, I think this is a very early Juncker with non-silver frame that someone mucked up later by adding a fake “800” stamp to it.
Comment
Users Viewing this Thread
Collapse
There are currently 3 users online. 0 members and 3 guests.
Most users ever online was 8,717 at 11:48 PM on 01-11-2024.
Comment