AlsacDirect

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

EK2 pointers on mm

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    EK2 pointers on mm

    HI to all , would value any pointers on this on possible 23mm thanks for any help martin.
    Attached Files

    #2
    ok , now looking in the light of day (not half a sleep) i no longer think this is a 23 MM so now i am at a loss so any pointers would be great. best to all martin.

    Comment


      #3
      Looks like a W&H by finish, paint and chracteristics.

      Comment


        #4
        Still looks like a 23 with the fat bead . Can't see the other flaw.... need a better close up .

        Douglas
        Attached Files

        Comment


          #5
          Douglas,
          IMO it's certanly not 23. Reasons;
          • 23 had a lot straghter arms on the frame.
          • 23 did not have a S&L based frame, but this one here has.
          • The core has nothing to do with 23 or Meybauer.


          It might look like a flaw similiar on 23's, but the frame is far froman 23 frame.

          IMO we have a W&H here, based on the reasons I stated in my previous post.



          Best regards,
          Daniel

          Comment


            #6
            Well his picture is not good - hoping for a better one .

            And it does not completely match this W&H - core is different and frame is a S&L base frame .
            Did W&H use 2 cores ?

            Douglas
            Attached Files

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by Douglas 5 View Post
              Well his picture is not good - hoping for a better one .

              Douglas
              Let's await for a closer picture before we continue

              I am not 100% certain is it W&H, but there are characteristics I tend to see on them, shallow reverse date, the frosting, the matte paint, a bit rounder innercorners than usually on S&L based frames etc.

              I think it's potentially W&H,
              S&L based cross for sure.

              Comment


                #8
                Its all up to better pictures .

                Douglas

                Comment


                  #9
                  IMO Daniel is right - it's W&H (=109)

                  For us, unfortunately, the execution crosses W&H are characterized by a large discrepancy and large variations in quality.
                  But some features are immutable
                  - the shape of the frame with typical flaws,
                  - the shape of the upper right arm of the swaz
                  - isolated digits in the date 1813, which is usually almost touches the bottom of the frame.

                  I found a similar picture (sorry not mine)

                  Regards
                  Jarek
                  Attached Files

                  Comment


                    #10
                    The reverse date on this one is not as low .

                    Douglas
                    Attached Files

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Thanks guys for the great information , sorry to all but I don't have any other photos I was interested in buying it but , really after a straight arm . but then again it dose look a nice cross thanks for the input best martin.

                      Comment

                      Users Viewing this Thread

                      Collapse

                      There is currently 1 user online. 0 members and 1 guests.

                      Most users ever online was 8,717 at 11:48 PM on 01-11-2024.

                      Working...
                      X