Probably a little solder between the frames near the loop can give it that appearance but certainly not on the Dietrich photo.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
3/4 ring Knight´s Cross Holders
Collapse
X
-
I confess, it was an EK2 before I got done with it. I don't know why I did it. Chipped a little paint, rubbed it in all the right places.
It sounded good at the moment... Should have "lost" it when you had it stored here for a few months... Then I'd have it in hand to look more carefully... You know I have these "spells". Vapors. Drink.
I'm changing my name...
Ol' Brian S credibility shot to $hit now...
And right before I'm about to show an amazing discovery that will change the course of SK history...Last edited by Brian S; 04-22-2016, 10:31 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mr. Evil Catt View PostBrian, you drunkard.
You've examined this cross in person.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Brian S View PostTruth be told I never so much as touched the cross, literally. It is amazing to see this cross lying in front of you next to Thiem's photo and see the exact paint chips in the photo. Postwar chips and changes from handling would be unforgivable. This RK is one of the best kept in any collection if not the very best given its state in direct comparison to war period photographs.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dietrich Maerz View PostThat "Excellent Theory" has only one little hick-up - the ring is not soldered on but part of the frame.Attached Files
Comment
-
Sorry! I mis-measured. The ribbon width is 36mm (I thought measuring quickly that it was a 40mm). Wider than standard 1939 EKII ribbons and about the same size as an 1870 EKII ribbon. (Learn something new every day!)
P.S. Seems to have a 25 white stitch count, but I might be blind on that tonight, too.Last edited by Leroy; 04-23-2016, 09:13 PM.
Comment
Users Viewing this Thread
Collapse
There is currently 0 user online. 0 members and 0 guests.
Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.
Comment