.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Ritterkreuz without maker mark
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Ludwig View PostNot made by any of the official war time producers.
In these books you will find information about this kind of Knight crosses:
http://www.amazon.com/Iron-Cross-193.../dp/0912138866
http://www.amazon.de/Bewertungs-Kata.../dp/3934001068
Comment
-
Originally posted by Von.Burgdorf View PostDo you have read books or only forums?
In these books you will find information about this kind of Knight crosses:
http://www.amazon.com/Iron-Cross-193.../dp/0912138866
http://www.amazon.de/Bewertungs-Kata.../dp/3934001068
Comment
-
Originally posted by Peter J. View PostPerhaps he bought it from his former Swedish girlfriendRegards
Hans N
Don´t throw away your fake WB´s! Get in touch with me.
I collect them for reference purposes for the benefit of the hobby (for the right "fake" price of course).
Comment
-
Originally posted by Von.Burgdorf View Post.
Why hide it? Why kill the links? The answer wasn't what you wanted? Now those of us who didn't see the original pix will never know, and therefore not learn from the thread.
HankUnless it was nighttime, or the weather was bad, and you were running out of gas - then it was a sweaty nightmare, like a monkey f*ing a skunk.
~ Dan Hampton, Viper Pilot
Comment
-
I've seen this so often in doing research here. We all know 'why' someone deletes the reference photos. As stated, they didn't like the answers and want no evidence of the piece left for a potential buyer to find.
Why on earth doesn't management simply delete these useless threads and sanction the member?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rick C View Post
Why on earth doesn't management simply delete these useless threads and sanction the member?
The owner of the site was made aware of the situation more than 20 times but sees no need to change anything, meaning to allow only WAF posted photos.
What we members can do is copy the photos and repost them. That wil preserve the thread.
Erasing the thread will at this point only serve one purpose: to erase the name of the "offender." I don't want to do that.
Dietrich
Comment
Users Viewing this Thread
Collapse
There are currently 2 users online. 0 members and 2 guests.
Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.
Comment