Hi Douglas,
You explained it thoroughly ! I have a Deschler's book and I also analyzed the production dies process ... all right
But you still have not answered the question - why do You reject a possibility that this is the same matrix, used during the production of crosses, and this defect is random secondary, and it is not proof that were using the new die?
... although there is a possibility of potentially ...
Jarek
You explained it thoroughly ! I have a Deschler's book and I also analyzed the production dies process ... all right
But you still have not answered the question - why do You reject a possibility that this is the same matrix, used during the production of crosses, and this defect is random secondary, and it is not proof that were using the new die?
... although there is a possibility of potentially ...
Jarek
Comment