both eks are well known fakes and also appear as "normal" ek1/2....
-
-
!
I guess I don't know as much as I thought I did.Comment
-
Truth is ... alot of us don'tOriginally posted by nate ellis
Comment
-
!!!
Dietrich, you point is well taken. I guess I don't know as much as i thought i did.
nateComment
-
Nate,
Living is learning and that's what makes this site so usefull!
regards,
Dietrich
Originally posted by nate ellisComment
-
Very interesting.
I have seen exactly one in almost 40 years of EK collecting and now I have seen three in less than a month. Be very careful out there my friends.
TonyAn opinion should be the result of thought, not a substitute for it.
"First ponder, then dare." von MoltkeComment
-
My question regarding these is: If they were made in Stalingrad (or wherever in wartime Russia) who the heck for? It's not like the Russians would pin one on, would they? Would they make prisoners wear them? Tape them to dead guys? Seems like they could've been doing about a zillion other things more productive than making crosses....
Of course, being in the military myself, I am aware of "wasted time".Unless it was nighttime, or the weather was bad, and you were running out of gas - then it was a sweaty nightmare, like a monkey f*ing a skunk.
~ Dan Hampton, Viper PilotComment
-
I know nothing of these crosses, but according to the German Dictionary that I have fur with the dots over the u means for, I don't find fur without the dots?Originally posted by DietrichComment
-
According to Gordon's book page 158:Originally posted by hankmeisterMy question regarding these is: If they were made in Stalingrad (or wherever in wartime Russia) who the heck for? It's not like the Russians would pin one on, would they? Would they make prisoners wear them? Tape them to dead guys? Seems like they could've been doing about a zillion other things more productive than making crosses....
Of course, being in the military myself, I am aware of "wasted time".
" A Propaganda Iron Cross made by the Soviets in 1941, cleverly substitutes the date 1941, the year that Germany invaded the Soviet Union, for the original 1939 date. These were made in both 1st and 2nd class form, and are single piece construction. According to Russian Research published in a German magazine in the 1980's, only around 500 were produced, sometime during the period of the siege of Leningrad"
As far as doing a zillion things besides making these crosses .. I suppose they could have, but how much time and energy did all the warring factions take in making propaganda pieces? Whether they were leaflets dropped or Iron Crosses made to insult a high award piece .. it all strikes the same chord.Comment
-
Hello Dietrich,please allow me to ask this question due to my poor knowledges,why the russians made this propaganda crosses?Thank you very much.Originally posted by Dietrich
Best Regards
Comment
-
Hi,
As to the why's behind this cross, I'll leave to others.
For me though, the first class cross posted by Killjoy is a fake/repro. The main pin is the huge giveaway - as StefanK has already mentioned/hinted, the exact same pin is found on recent ?Latvian "standard" 1939 EK1 repros. If it had been dated as 1998 (plus or minus a year or two) instead of 1941, I'd have said it was genuine!
Regards
Mike KRegards
Mike
Evaluate the item, not the story and not the seller's reputation!
If you PM/contact me without the courtesy of using your first name, please don't be offended if I politely ignore you!Comment
Comment