I have owned this Knights Cross for about 25 years....but I am considering selling it and would like your opinion. The rear is marked L/58 800. No ribbon or hanger. Medals are really not my thing....so I hope the pictures are clear enough. I was going to clean it a bit before photographing...but I know how some folks freak out about that....so the black center has some dust on it. The center is magnetic.
-
-
More pictures: -
And last:Comment
-
Knights cross
Not original. IMO
Comment
-
Post War made Souval Knights Cross. Probably made in the 50's or 60's. TomComment
-
A lovely postwar double marked Souval KC ! Though postwar, still collectable !Comment
-
A textbook postwar Souval knights cross. Still without the typical frame errrors of the later years. IMO a 1950's made cross. Very nice and collectable.
Best regards,
AlexComment
-
It is a nice example.Comment
-
Very nice early piece. Please do not clean it. I believe it would hurt the value.
Lots of character. I sure wish I owned it.
KenComment
-
Well....darn. I guess it has little value then? This came from a WWII vet that stayed in Germany during the post-war occupation years. He must have gotten it then. I always thought this was a wartime example.
I've had a few PM's with WAG's of a price offer....but nothing that was substantial. Any idea of value?Comment
-
The ring on this piece is finished considerably better than most Souvals. I would think it is VERY early.Comment
-
Somewhere around $500 as it's an early piece, but without the loop/ ribbon etc. Others could give a better indication.Comment
-
I paid about 650 EURO for one, but it came with early postwar St&L OLS, ribbon AND provenance to an SS veteran.
This one ... without loop and ribbon .... around 250-300 Euro ???
MathijsComment
-
I don't collect Souval pieces, however I bought one during a visit to the Souval shop in the 1970's. Today's going price is pretty much what the others have said. I paid $25.00 for mine way back when, but guy's do collect them so who knows ????? TomComment
-
Nice patina!Comment
Comment