Tom, Dave, RK Opinions...

[Jim Baker]

Hey Guys,

I'm having problems blowing up these photos. Can I please get some opinions on this piece. Thanks much.

[Jim Baker]

Reverse

[Jim Baker]

More

[Jim Baker]

Last.

[Jim Baker]

It's obviously worn on the beading. It looks like there is some ## on the corners but I can't blow up the photo to really tell well.

Are there any characteristics you guys see that can go or .

Thanks.

[Tom M]

From the photos given I would jump in and say it is an original example. I see a couple of characteristics which make me think But I think the other more experienced members will correct me if I'm wrong. Oh and get ready to take some better photos of the 3 O'clock arm

[Jim Baker]

Hi Tom,

Thanks. OK, you're dealing with a dummy here. What am I looking for at the 3 O'clock arm??

[Biro]

No '3'o'clock' problems with Juncker Jim.....that'll be S&L's job.....

I think they might like it!

Marshall

[Dave Kane]

Jim, even considering the photo quality there's enough there to suggest that the cross is good!!!

[Harry]

Very Nice Jim!

Has it got a gap between the iron core and frame in the 12 O'clock position obverse side?

[Jim Baker]

Well Guys,

It's gone. That might be the buy of the century (so far). It just sold for $1200.00

[upbeek]

rk

hi jim,is it your crooss it looks nice,chay

[upbeek]

rk

thats horrific chay

[Dave Kane]

Where was it Jim?

[Jim Baker]

Dave,

Sent a PM.

HELP!!! I still have a chance at it. Need an answer REALLY quick or I loose it.