Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
What do you prefer? A well worn Knights Cross or a minty one?
Collapse
X
-
But a piece just found in the workshops or warehouses of the main RK manufacturers in Germany after the war without having been awarded and still wrapped with the celophan has no soul IMHO. It's gorgeous and very beautiful for display, but where is the story behind the award? However, of course, I respect the opinion of people who prefer minty awards.Last edited by Gernika81; 02-17-2012, 08:00 PM.
Comment
-
They both have their place. Of course, Harry is right that without provenance, wear can be the result of a mint cross being bounced around for 70 years, but in some cases, you can actually tell, from the pattern of wear (if there is one) whether it was worn. The loop and the rear beading are good places to look.
Actaully, it's a good thing to have both a mint one and a worn one, just to "cover all bases"!
Comment
-
Originally posted by DaveNZ View PostIm curious: whats the attraction to own a minty unworn KC?
surely you'd rather one that has seen the blood and iron of war
I do like them worn too, but not beat up and rusty
Comment
Users Viewing this Thread
Collapse
There is currently 1 user online. 0 members and 1 guests.
Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.
Comment