ring marker 231 EK2???

[Steinar]

jcwater: Can you try and post a close up of that mm 231 please?

This cross really looks ok, as a fake cross, the fakers are starting to get the beading better and better, looking at it from these pictures, but it might feel different in hand though.. anyway, that patina sure looks strange.

[Thomas H]

Hi Steinar,

It took him more than three years to come with this picture, so don't expect him to post the picture today haha

Cheers, Thomas

[Steinar]

haha just noticed the 2004 date Thomas

[grueni1208]

An old "333" with new mark, but the same old date flaws (1813).

Regards

Daniel

[colt45s]

do some fakes look better than originals?

[Steinar]

IMHO: No way. Once you got a authentic cross in your hand, you can feel the quality.

[Robert P.]

An old "333" with new mark, but the same old date flaws (1813).

Regards

Daniel

Daniel, you're really sharp. I see the top of the '1', the flaw, and the angled top of the '3' in 1813. You're exactly right. It's the fake '333' with new mark.

Robert

[jcwater]

long time ago
some pics invalidation.
So I to do upload today~

everyone good luck~~