CollectorsGuild

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

EK2 unmagnetic - good or fake?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    EK2 unmagnetic - good or fake?

    Hi guys,
    The seller has me EK2 unmagentic offered.
    I have only two pics.
    Is this piece a Original? If it is original, which Maker is this EK2?
    best regards
    J0hnny

    <a target='_blank' title='ImageShack - Image And Video Hosting' href='http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/11/ek2unmagnetic1a.jpg/'><img src='http://img11.imageshack.us/img11/6684/ek2unmagnetic1a.jpg' border='0'/></a>

    <a target='_blank' title='ImageShack - Image And Video Hosting' href='http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/684/ek2unmagnetic1b.jpg/'><img src='http://img684.imageshack.us/img684/9586/ek2unmagnetic1b.jpg' border='0'/></a>

    #2
    No one wants to write

    I know of only unmagnetic EK2 Juncker, but this EK2 is unmagnetic.
    What do they mean?

    Comment


      #3
      Hi Johnny.

      In my opinion this cross are good, but I can place a maker on it right now.
      I'm using my phone, so the pics are not so big.
      More makers made non-magnetic crosses.

      Wait for a few other opinions.

      Comment


        #4
        Hello Johnny
        there were just a few manufacturers that produced zinc cored EKIIs, but honestly I don't recognize who was for this cross.

        Comment


          #5
          In my opinion this could be a postwar S&L. Anyway I would not buy it because of my own uncertainty.

          Makers of wartime non-magnetic EK2s included:

          2
          3 (Schinkels)
          86
          L/15
          unknown maker Schinkel (IMO Assmann)
          unknown maker Schinkel 2

          ...and maybe more. Who did I forget?
          Best regards,
          Streptile

          Looking for ROUND BUTTON 1939 EK1 Spange cases (LDO or PKZ)

          Comment


            #6
            Thank you for your accurate information from unmagnetic EK2.
            I will remember it
            best regards Johnny

            Comment


              #7
              Johnny, I think the lack of replies was caused by the pictures.
              It is hard to see the date, one of the things that you have to see to identify a cross.

              I'm with Trevor, I also think it's a post-war S&L

              Comment


                #8
                Hi Johnny :
                Had a look at that one and to me it is a good war time made S&L .
                I have been asked by a few members here if I know which post war crosses S&L made . I have worked on war time S&Ls exclusively . Post war S&L crosses do exit and have only started on a closer look to see what possibly could be post war . A very difficult task that will take alot of time yet . Sofar one peculiar core and one deffinate frame are good candidates amongst some other remote posibilities . Right now I can say that many of these immediate post war crosses will not be identifyable .
                S&L used 2 different frames with Zink cores ; Johnny's ( later war) and the 2nd one shown which I think Robert Pierce once owned (early war).

                Douglas
                Attached Files

                Comment


                  #9
                  And the - to me a post war S&L - same frame but different core , as Johnny's ... which does not appeare to be the same Ni aloy material ? Frame die is bad and very worn with cracks through the corners and a strange core . Think a re-activated die with a post war core .

                  Douglas
                  Attached Files

                  Comment

                  Users Viewing this Thread

                  Collapse

                  There are currently 2 users online. 0 members and 2 guests.

                  Most users ever online was 8,717 at 11:48 PM on 01-11-2024.

                  Working...
                  X