would anybody be kind enough to post the pics for me , and give me your views 
-
Last edited by theunionjack; 03-10-2004, 05:00 PM. -
Why is it suspicious?Originally posted by theunionjackwould anybody be kind enough to post the pics for me , and give me your views
it looks OK to me, can you show the front?
regards
jon -
front
hope this works ....the front,,,!!!!Originally posted by tinmantisComment
-
worked nice one
i dont know , there is just something that tells me something about this cross is not right , , or have i been looking at it too long?
Comment
-
I think your mm#6 EK1 looks OK - here's a pic of mine for comparsion which is a good example
AlComment
-
Looks good. Why are you troubled by it?
How much did you pay for it and where did you obtain it from?
If you paid $20 for it and feel uneasy, maybe. Or maybe you got a hell of a deal!
Comment
-
The cross is OK.
DietrichComment
-
....just slightly paranoid!Originally posted by Dietrich
Comment
-
This cross is totally legit. I have one just like it - unfortunately I can't post images of it because I recently lost my hard drive.
BrianComment
-
Through I have limited knowledge on EK's, the only problem I have with it is that it is not in my collection. Handsome looking piece, nice strike on the mm too
Quick question, is there a die flaw in the cross hatching at the bottom of the cross? Or is it just the lighting in the pictures?
-ShaneComment
-
Thanks guys , i paid 70 for it
the box i am totally happy with , what was worrying me was the date but you all seem to be happy with it so this gives it a thumbs up for me, the pics dont really talk too much but the date appears to be so flat is only stands out about 2 mm , which when i compare this to other crosses there is a big difference , i am not saying the date is worn , not at all , its just not very pronounced, but thanks anyway
Comment
Comment