I have a suspisious ek1 number 6

[theunionjack]

would anybody be kind enough to post the pics for me , and give me your views

[tinmantis]

would anybody be kind enough to post the pics for me , and give me your views

Why is it suspicious?
it looks OK to me, can you show the front?
regards
jon

[theunionjack]

front

Why is it suspicious?
it looks OK to me, can you show the front?
regards
jon

hope this works ....the front,,,!!!!

[theunionjack]

worked nice one

i dont know , there is just something that tells me something about this cross is not right , , or have i been looking at it too long?

[Spitfire]

I think your mm#6 EK1 looks OK - here's a pic of mine for comparsion which is a good example

Al

[Wilson Khoo]

Looks good. Why are you troubled by it?

How much did you pay for it and where did you obtain it from?

If you paid $20 for it and feel uneasy, maybe. Or maybe you got a hell of a deal!

[Dietrich Maerz]

The cross is OK.


Dietrich

[Eric Stahlhut]

The cross is OK....


Dietrich

....just slightly paranoid!

[Brian R]

This cross is totally legit. I have one just like it - unfortunately I can't post images of it because I recently lost my hard drive.


Brian

[Airborne Nut]

Through I have limited knowledge on EK's, the only problem I have with it is that it is not in my collection. Handsome looking piece, nice strike on the mm too

Quick question, is there a die flaw in the cross hatching at the bottom of the cross? Or is it just the lighting in the pictures?

-Shane

[theunionjack]

Thanks guys , i paid 70 for it

the box i am totally happy with , what was worrying me was the date but you all seem to be happy with it so this gives it a thumbs up for me, the pics dont really talk too much but the date appears to be so flat is only stands out about 2 mm , which when i compare this to other crosses there is a big difference , i am not saying the date is worn , not at all , its just not very pronounced, but thanks anyway