800 marked KC

[Sergey]

Hi all. What do you think about this one? Good or bad?

[Sergey]

2

[Dietrich Maerz]

Not Good


Dietrich

[Sergey]

3

[Sergey]

4

[Sergey]

Not Good


Dietrich

What is wrong?

[Yuri D.]

This looks very Latvian to me. Just the squat frame and metal colour.

Yuri

[Pascal H.]

This looks very Latvian to me. Just the squat frame and metal colour.

Yuri

I agree with Yuri. Very much like Latvian.

Pascal

[Sergey]

Hi Guys I cant agree.My scans not so good. I can say that The cross has dark, but bright frame. It looks like old.

[Pieter Verbruggen]

..as fake as it can be...

Pieter.

[Sergey]

I founded only this threat about Latvians fakes of EKs.http://dev.wehrmacht-awards.com/foru...threadid=13746
I must say my cross very different( numbers of dates, swas, paint, ring.)

[Peter Wiking]

Fake.

The year number/date is wrong for one thing

Sorry my friend.
Peter Wiking

[Dez H]

Looks like an attempt to copy a Zimmermann/Godet RK.

[VonLuger]

Sergey-people here are only trying to help fellow collectors, Why are you defending this repro RK, just because you 'believe this is real' doesn't make it real...did you get burnt?

[Sergey]

Fake.

The year number/date is wrong.

Sorry.
Peter Wiking

Hi Peter when you say number/date wrong, concerning which Cross is wrong?
If I have fake L/12 KC and original L/12 cross, in this case on the fake cross numbers of date will be wrong concerning the date on original cross. But why is wrong the numbers on my cross? Sorry I need more info