Originally posted by blutundehre
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Knight Cross with Oak Leaves and Swords Steinhauer & Lück
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by norsk41elv View PostOriginal ?
And price USD 16.000 is ok ?
Dietrich
Comment
-
Originally posted by norsk41elv View PostThank you so much
I was planing to transfer payment tonight, and luckily I posted here first ! I`m a little bit shaky now
Never seen or study the KC, so I trusted the seller.
This Forum is the best, so thank you.
Regards from Norway
Jørn
Jon-Olav
Comment
-
Originally posted by norsk41elv View PostThank you so much
I was planing to transfer payment tonight, and luckily I posted here first ! I`m a little bit shaky now
Never seen or study the KC, so I trusted the seller.
This Forum is the best, so thank you.
Regards from Norway
Jørn
Comment
-
Dietrich,
Not to defend Barry Turk or Detlev Niemann, but why are you saying that the cross is postwar???? The cross is not a "B" frame nor is it a "C" frame. There's no dent row and no 6-9 bridge flaw. On the site, it appears to be an unissued "A" type. Are you seeing something else?
Regards,
Leroy
Comment
-
Dietrich,
I think the "dent row" is an optical illusion caused by loss of frosting. If you go on the e-medals site (and you are much more proficient with computers than me!) you can save the page and actually blow-up the individual photos.
This is one of the 3 crosses that were on the so-called "salesmans boards" (actually "barter boards') discussed here some time ago. All were mint.
Interestingly, both the ordinary cross and the one with Oaks and Swords appeared to be standard "A" crosses, without flaws, while the one with Oaks only (sold now, I understand) had a "B" obverse and an unflawed "A" reverse. On that one, there was a clearly observable "bridge flaw" and what APPEARED to be a "dent row". Although a suggestion was made that the dent row there was also just worn frosting, it certainly appeared to my eyes to be a real dent row,much more defined and not explainable by just worn frosting.
The current cross shown in THIS thread, however, really does not have the bridge flaw and any suggestion of a dent row is, in fact, readily ascertainable as only frosting wear. The unfinished ring (as you know and pointed out in your book) is sometimes seen on wartime crosses. The paint on this one does appear to be bone-black, but with a higher sheen to it, almost as if a slight film of oil had been put on it . When these crosses were first shown in the old thread on the boards, the paint had a much more flat appearance.
I think a closer, and longer, look may be needed at this cross (in fact, all these crosses).
Regards,
Leroy
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dietrich Maerz View PostA closer look is always better. But unless I am seeing something I want to see, everything points towards a B-Type.
What are the changes that there is a dent at the exactly same spot where one is with the dent row? In combination with the other typical (late) B-Type features?
Someone should ask him for better pics ... for $16k, I'd think anyone would go out of their way to provide a few more snapshots. However, make sure you have a reputation for deep pockets or you will be ignored.
Comment
Users Viewing this Thread
Collapse
There are currently 4 users online. 0 members and 4 guests.
Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.
Comment