CollectorToCollector

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Another "Early Godet", could it be C F Zimmermann?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Another "Early Godet", could it be C F Zimmermann?

    First of all, these crosses can be seen here http://dev.wehrmacht-awards.com/foru...d.php?t=235168

    and here http://dev.wehrmacht-awards.com/foru...d.php?t=377545

    Fact is that they come in a EKI and EKII version, both frames and cores match 100%, this is the only real facts we have at the moment imo.

    They have been deemed Fake, Übergrösse and early Godet framed ones, but no proof yet. Could they be C F Zimmermann frames? At least Kai thinks so:

    "EK 1.Klasse 1939, an Nadel, ohne Hersteller (jedoch typisches Stück des Hersteller "20" Zimmermann), Eisenkern, leicht getragener Zustand"

    IF, and i say if, they are C F Zimmermann frames it means that we could have a C F Zimmermann assemblied EKII, so far none have been found marked.


    The whole CFZ/Godet connection needs to be studied deeper. Hi-res pics of hardware, paint, numbers, swaz and beading is a must. The close connection between Godet and C F Zimmermann does not make it easier. So many theories and no real proof of who bought whos frames and cores and who really assemblied them. To me the maker of a cross is the one who made the core and frames and put them together, not the one who sold them and possibly marked them as their own.
    Attached Files

    #2
    Hi Carl :
    Interesting that you should bring this one up . Always confusion and chalenges with these Iron Crosses . It is not the 'norm' and I have been looking into the minor differences and have found the cause !
    The company connection between Godet and CF Zimmermann is a quit known . The somehow odd crosses that do not quit match indicate another connection and something I suspected could exist and I think can be demonstrated with this cross . Disregard the Winkler description for now as it is IMO not correct .
    Looking at the shown cross above one can determine the fallowing ; It is high grade silver plated with applied lacquer - so manufacturing time wise it is a very early cross that one would expect to be unmarked . Now the core in that one is a CF Zimmerman Core ! However the frame is not a Godet and not a CF Zimmerman frame at all !!!
    Here is where I am now introducing a connection to the other name-like company Fritz Zimmermann ! The frame on the cross that opened the thread is the less common Fritz Zimmermann 1st frame EK die . How and why CF Z or maybe Godet got to use this frame (and parts combinations) I do not know ? Sold it ???
    What ever the case and reason a CF core ended up in a Fritz Z frame . The above cross is not a very even struck/trimmed cross . The top arm full bead count of 25 on both matches . The 2 Fritz Zimmerman dies to compare it with .

    Douglas
    Attached Files

    Comment


      #3
      That's a very interesting theory Douglas! Always wondered if the 2 Zimmermanns shared more than their name. However, the cross on the left in your pic is not a match to the one that started the thread imo. Do you have close up's of the swaz/inner corner area? The 'unknown frame-CFZ/Godet core' cross has very distinct flaws and a very wide type of beading.

      Comment


        #4
        One of the distinct flaws, found on the 4 o' clock inner corner.
        Attached Files

        Comment


          #5
          Another one, 2 o' clock outer corner.
          Attached Files

          Comment


            #6
            Sorry , took awile to get back regarding theat cross - Carl . I had been working early on a few projects this morning . My mistake - as you pointed out they do not match , and not sure why I used the Fritz Z for comparison as the Godet early EK2 and early EK1 have the 2 same flaws very clearly to be seen . Can't remember now who's early Godet EK2 I used now .

            Douglas
            Attached Files

            Comment


              #7
              Hey Carl,

              Have you considered the similarities between this frame (thread-starter) and the frame of the "Swastika-on-base" Round 3 EK2? I don't have an example of either one, but perhaps someone could check them against eachother? I know there is a lug on one and none on the latter, but I'm just casting around here for a match...

              "Early Godet":


              Swatika-on-base R-3:
              Best regards,
              Streptile

              Looking for ROUND BUTTON 1939 EK1 Spange cases (LDO or PKZ)

              Comment


                #8
                The full bead count on the top arm on the Godet is 25 and on the R3 looks like 27 or 28 ..or so - in any case more . .. different dies .

                Douglas

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by Douglas 5 View Post
                  The full bead count on the top arm on the Godet is 25 and on the R3 looks like 27 or 28 ..or so - in any case more . .. different dies .

                  Douglas
                  Yes, right, thank Douglas .
                  Best regards,
                  Streptile

                  Looking for ROUND BUTTON 1939 EK1 Spange cases (LDO or PKZ)

                  Comment

                  Users Viewing this Thread

                  Collapse

                  There are currently 2 users online. 0 members and 2 guests.

                  Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.

                  Working...
                  X