I guess I'm still confused, because it seems to match the example in your second link.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
KVK 1 Opinions
Collapse
X
-
Chad,
The hard facts are:
1. We have two types of 'L15' crosses here, both receiving the ...
2. I've looked into every achived thread to pull up these two links for you to judge from...
3. You have to make the decision to either go with your badge or send it back, based upon the information set before you...
4. I gave you my opinion, but you have make the ultimate decision yourself...
5. I told you there were gray areas with this L15 maker mark which has caused confusion to many in the past...
6. You have time to study deeper...
Robert
Comment
-
Originally posted by robert pierce View PostChad,
The hard facts are:
1. We have two types of 'L15' crosses here, both receiving the ...
2. I've looked into every achived thread to pull up these two links for you to judge from...
3. You have to make the decision to either go with your badge or send it back, based upon the information set before you...
4. I gave you my opinion, but you have make the ultimate decision yourself...
5. I told you there were gray areas with this L15 maker mark which has caused confusion to many in the past...
6. You have time to study deeper...
Robert
You're right and I truly appreciate all the help. It has been educational to say the least. I will take your advice and take a look at all the facts on the thread.
Thanks again,
Chad
Comment
-
I would say that's a real "Schickle" :
http://dev.wehrmacht-awards.com/foru...d.php?t=301463
It's the same hinge and pin system like the early [L/15] EK I's.
The design of this KVK looks like a late war production, which I personally think is not by Schickle. At the moment I think they are by F. Orth.
Regards
DanielRegards
Daniel
Search:
!!! all awards with [L/15] mark !!!
Otto Schickle
All early 57er pieces
Comment
-
Now you have more to study Chad,
Daniel has given you some lengthy threads to digest, and I hope you can stay focused through all the yaddi yaddi, and come though it with something understandable. 'L/15' vs. 'L15' is nearly as confusing as the Juncker EK debate. Well, maybe just confusing to me. When I see two crosses with the same hardware, yet the badges differ in obverse detailing, I stumble at the thought of both being original, or at least declared to be by the same maker.
Robert
Comment
-
Originally posted by grueni1208 View PostI would say that's a real "Schickle" :
http://dev.wehrmacht-awards.com/foru...d.php?t=301463
It's the same hinge and pin system like the early [L/15] EK I's.
The design of this KVK looks like a late war production, which I personally think is not by Schickle. At the moment I think they are by F. Orth.
Regards
Daniel
I'm also not buying that L/15 should be Orth. I'm aware of the mm1 - L/10 and 3 - L/11 so it would perhaps seem logical that mm15 (Orth) could be L/15. Only problem is that Orth already have L/14 so it doesn't seem so likely imo.
Comment
-
Originally posted by nachtundnebel View PostOnly problem is that Orth already have L/14 so it doesn't seem so likely imo.
Regards
DanielRegards
Daniel
Search:
!!! all awards with [L/15] mark !!!
Otto Schickle
All early 57er pieces
Comment
-
Originally posted by grueni1208 View PostI would say that's a real "Schickle" :
http://dev.wehrmacht-awards.com/foru...d.php?t=301463
It's the same hinge and pin system like the early [L/15] EK I's.
The design of this KVK looks like a late war production, which I personally think is not by Schickle. At the moment I think they are by F. Orth.
Regards
Daniel
Comment
Users Viewing this Thread
Collapse
There is currently 1 user online. 0 members and 1 guests.
Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.
Comment