HI ALL:
Lets try this question again. This time please don't respond unless you have significant input. The current facts are dims. 47.02 height, 46.98 width.4.49 thick and 22.80 grms. Sold by a reputable dealer on a consistant basis known as Ubergrosse. These are supposed to be the fore runner to the RK at dims 48.0MM. My question is simple Gordon Williamsions book references an Ubergrosse at 47.5mm. Does anyone have one , or have one of these at that dimension. If so please post detail pics and dims. Also does anyone have proverences on these cross's. It has been said or thought that maker #47 mfg these pieces. Does anyone have proverences of this. I'm having trouble about the poor mfg standard applied in the mfg. process as some indicate. .025 mm undersize all around if difficult to acheive without a jig fixture , Can any one shead some light on this for me. Where they rejected RK'S that didin't make the grade filed down. Questions ????? Help.Looking for answers that make sense.
Lets try this question again. This time please don't respond unless you have significant input. The current facts are dims. 47.02 height, 46.98 width.4.49 thick and 22.80 grms. Sold by a reputable dealer on a consistant basis known as Ubergrosse. These are supposed to be the fore runner to the RK at dims 48.0MM. My question is simple Gordon Williamsions book references an Ubergrosse at 47.5mm. Does anyone have one , or have one of these at that dimension. If so please post detail pics and dims. Also does anyone have proverences on these cross's. It has been said or thought that maker #47 mfg these pieces. Does anyone have proverences of this. I'm having trouble about the poor mfg standard applied in the mfg. process as some indicate. .025 mm undersize all around if difficult to acheive without a jig fixture , Can any one shead some light on this for me. Where they rejected RK'S that didin't make the grade filed down. Questions ????? Help.Looking for answers that make sense.
Comment