EK II Opinion.

[stgeorge64]

Opinions welcome on this EK II. The ring has a makers mark on it which I cannot make out and there is nothing which instantly stands out as being a wrong one however, I appreciate the opinions of the experts. I hope the pics prove clear enough, all help will be well recieved.

Regards Richard.

[stgeorge64]

Reverse side.

Regards Richard.

[stgeorge64]

After just reviewing this post I would like to point out that the green hue on the pics are not on the cross in reality.

Regards Richard.

[meriksson]

The cross is a bit dark, cant see the date and rim so good. Well i think i can see die flaws, on more than one place. And it can well be a Maybauer maker 7, some off those have die flaws more or less and also some times unclear maker marks or should i say on every one . One other maker has unclear mark that is 24, but no wide frame on urs. And i have one not listed as maker, nr 136 if i remeber correct but then you need a microskop whit 25X to see it.
Mikael

[StefanK.]

not a meybauer in my opinion according the dates...

[tinmantis]

lightened up, but still a bad scan!
regards
jon

[LuckyLuudje]

Based on these (not very detailed) scans.
My best gues would be a "52" if the Swas has a normal height.
And a "75" if the swas is very high.

Best regards,
Luud

[stgeorge64]

Luud, I can confirm that the swastika is of normal height on this piece.

Regards Richard.