Why are there only 47 non-combatant EK2s? Are they really that rare(with the ribbon and all) or just not that desireable? I know that in the modern military, 9-10ths of the military are the logistical support for the 10% who actually do the fighting. I would think that there would be far more noncombatant awards that noncombatants...
Yes, it might sound strange, but some things are different from what they were 90+ years ago. Firstly, non-combatants had to achieve a great deal more to get an ek2, simply because they weren't in combat. Logistics has improved alot since then and the ratio, i dare say, has changed with it. Here are a few telling figures: In the Franco-Prussian of 1870-71 a total of 43,242 combatant ek2s were awarded against 4,002 non-combatants. And during the great war the figures tell even more; 3,700,000+ combatant ek2s vs. 13,000 non-combatants.. I hope that helped, Paul
Thank you all once more for this job you have given me. Another week almoust gone and here we are again doing some serious work. Enjoy.
Summa summarum part 54
1813
Gross Kreuz
I cl.
II cl. 10
II cl. (non-combanant)
1870
Gross Kreuz
I cl. 8
II cl. 71
II cl. (non-combanant) 10
II cl. oak leaves 33
Merit Cross for Women 1
1914
Gross Kreuz 1
I cl. 434
II cl. 1170 !?!
II cl. (non-combanant) 47
II cl. Spange 12
1939
Gross Kreuz
RK oak leaves, swords and diamonds 1
RK oak leaves and swords 3
RK oak leaves 7
RK 44!
I cl. 638!!!!
I cl. Spange 82
II cl. 909!
II cl. Spange 99
1957
I cl. 38
I cl. Spange 6
II cl. 38
II cl. Spange 5
RK 30
Oak leaves 8
Oak leaves and swords 11
Comment