Warning: session_start(): open(/var/cpanel/php/sessions/ea-php74/sess_babda0305f4b548f8e35ac1eadc5436a2a895ddb6f9a68ba, O_RDWR) failed: No space left on device (28) in /home/devwehrmacht/public_html/forums/includes/vb5/frontend/controller/page.php on line 71 Warning: session_start(): Failed to read session data: files (path: /var/cpanel/php/sessions/ea-php74) in /home/devwehrmacht/public_html/forums/includes/vb5/frontend/controller/page.php on line 71 Narvik - Wehrmacht-Awards.com Militaria Forums
oorlogsspullen

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Narvik

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Narvik

    I was hoping to get some opinions on this one. I think it's a bad one but would like to hear what you guys think.


    Thanks

    TC
    Attached Files

    #2
    what makes you think its bad? it looks ok to me

    Comment


      #3
      .....

      I agree, looks like an original Deumer..

      Comment


        #4
        Thanks for responding.

        More photos.
        Attached Files

        Comment


          #5
          TC, I don't like this shield and IMO this is not an original shield.

          You will always find this shield with the following characteristics:

          - wide prongs;
          - backing plate which follows the shields contour;
          - stained backing paper which only covers the backing plate and never the backing cloth;
          - backing cloth which is been cut-out at an angle and isn't oval like it should be.

          I have to admit the shield's obverse is VERY good and on first observation it would pass for an original Deumer shield without a doubt. The reverse however should make you suspicious and only when observing the obverse very closely it will reveal some very small differences with the original.

          Also some very doubtful dealers have been selling this type of shield in the past.

          Kr
          Pascal

          Comment


            #6
            Pascal, I agree you on the reverse on this Narvik.

            You say that shield's obverse is VERY good.

            I have been looking at So called Deumer types here on forum.

            I see some diffrence here. For me it seems that the swastika legs don´t have the same aspect ratio, It´s also "soft" imo.

            Or what??
            Attached Files

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by hlynur76 View Post
              Pascal, I agree you on the reverse on this Narvik.

              You say that shield's obverse is VERY good.

              I have been looking at So called Deumer types here on forum.

              I see some diffrence here. For me it seems that the swastika legs don´t have the same aspect ratio, It´s also "soft" imo.

              Or what??
              You're right about the swas but I think those differences in the swas are quite hard to spot. There are IMO some better noticeable differences in the wreath.

              Kr
              Pascal

              Comment


                #8
                Thanks for your help.

                I appreciate it.

                Comment


                  #9
                  .....

                  Originally posted by Pascal Huysmans View Post
                  TC, I don't like this shield and IMO this is not an original shield.

                  You will always find this shield with the following characteristics:

                  - wide prongs;
                  - backing plate which follows the shields contour;
                  - stained backing paper which only covers the backing plate and never the backing cloth;
                  - backing cloth which is been cut-out at an angle and isn't oval like it should be.

                  I have to admit the shield's obverse is VERY good and on first observation it would pass for an original Deumer shield without a doubt. The reverse however should make you suspicious and only when observing the obverse very closely it will reveal some very small differences with the original.
                  Also some very doubtful dealers have been selling this type of shield in the past.

                  Kr
                  Pascal
                  Thanks for the info Pascal..certainly one to be wary of from the obverse anyway.

                  Comment

                  Users Viewing this Thread

                  Collapse

                  There is currently 1 user online. 0 members and 1 guests.

                  Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.

                  Working...
                  X