Warning: session_start(): open(/var/cpanel/php/sessions/ea-php74/sess_f0c29b2693e5e4ce737f4c23ae4ffc4c026b3add4956c0ef, O_RDWR) failed: No space left on device (28) in /home/devwehrmacht/public_html/forums/includes/vb5/frontend/controller/page.php on line 71 Warning: session_start(): Failed to read session data: files (path: /var/cpanel/php/sessions/ea-php74) in /home/devwehrmacht/public_html/forums/includes/vb5/frontend/controller/page.php on line 71 Krimshild for review - Wehrmacht-Awards.com Militaria Forums
Emedals - Medalbook

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Krimshild for review

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
    #1

    Krimshild for review

    Hello guys,
    this is not really my field and i would need your help on a Krimshild that i just got.
    It looks like a well worn piece (possibly a Deumer type?) and what's strange it seems that one pin is missing under the paper backing
    Is this an original Krim?

    Many thanks,
    Stefano
    Attached Files
    Tags: None
    #2
    the other side with paper backing and just 3 pins...
    Attached Files

    Comment

      #3
      ......

      Certainly looks OK...original Deumer as you say.

      Interesting to see the type of prongs used though

      KR..Peter
      Attached Files

      Comment

        #4
        .....

        Interesting picture Peter, the position of the prongs looks right, don't you think?
        Is this the first kind prongs used for this badge?
        Stefano

        Comment

          #5
          Hello Stefano!

          As Peter stated, an original Deumer shield. My personal opinion, a later manufactured piece due to the wear on the head area. Earlier pieces had less wear in this area and came from the same die, so I think a die wear progression points to a later made piece in this case.

          As far as attachment pins goes, I think we need to rethink old train of thoughts concerning this subject. IMO, many types of pins (needle, flat, short vs long) all could have been used simultaneously throughout the manufacturing timeline. In some case, different styles were both used on the same shield. Remember, these were just used to attach the shield to the backplate and covered up, so who really cares what was used and when? It's the die characteristics that should tell the story IMHO.

          Nice shield!
          Tim

          Comment

            #6
            Hello Tim, got your point and thanks a lot for the explanation!
            Cheers,
            Stefano

            Comment

              #7
              Hello Peter.Tim.Stefano
              First shield in the topic original by Deumer Classic
              Peter showed another type
              The first mount with solder and the second is used to mount flar
              I can not put this photo I put photo in GMIC
              the second as the original but a different type
              Sorry for my English

              Comment

                #8
                Hello Andrei,

                Welcome to WAF!
                Tim

                Comment

                  #9
                  .....

                  Hi Andrei...nice to see you over here.

                  I hope you don't mind me using the reverse image from your shield...just comparing those same prongs on the first shield posted.

                  KR..Peter

                  Comment

                    #10
                    Hi Tim and Peter
                    nice to see you too

                    Comment

                    Previous template Next

                    Users Viewing this Thread

                    Collapse

                    There is currently 1 user online. 0 members and 1 guests.

                    Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.

                    Working...
                    X