Warning: session_start(): open(/var/cpanel/php/sessions/ea-php74/sess_fc151a05dc4b350d1e5010094aee334c7b423ac60cebce81, O_RDWR) failed: No space left on device (28) in /home/devwehrmacht/public_html/forums/includes/vb5/frontend/controller/page.php on line 71 Warning: session_start(): Failed to read session data: files (path: /var/cpanel/php/sessions/ea-php74) in /home/devwehrmacht/public_html/forums/includes/vb5/frontend/controller/page.php on line 71 Cholm - original or fake? - Wehrmacht-Awards.com Militaria Forums
WW2Treasures

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Cholm - original or fake?

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 7
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 template Next
    #91
    Originally posted by Stijn David View Post
    Hello,


    Please do show us the letter of authenticity + a large and detailed scan of the picture as shown so we non believers can convince ourselves.


    Cordial greetings,
    Dear Stijn,

    I have some real problems with you mentioning “we non believers”

    First of all who are “we” in your reply?

    Secondly and probably much more important what do you “non believers” not believe?
    Is it that you don’t believe that I have a scan of a letter of authenticity by Dr. Klietmann?

    Or is it that you non-believers do not believe in the authenticity of KBH’s shield?
    Would the publication of Dr. Klietmann’s letter make any difference to this belief and I am quoting Gene here “Klietmann? You do realize how negatively he is viewed, right?”

    One other thing, I have asked several times in this thread to come up with any evidence why the shield of KBH is a fake or any examples of original zinc Cholm shields with 4 prongs to compare the shield from KBH to.
    Not one scan or even one reply to this request but at the first hint of the existence of a letter of authenticity by Dr Klietmann I am not only asked to post Dr. Kliemann’s letter but also to post “a large and detailed scan of the shield”.

    I can and could of course post the letter and a detailed scan of the shield but as this would not contribute to authentication of KBH’s shield it would only prove the existence of this type of shield for more than 20 years so I have decided not to post any scans for the moment.

    KR
    Pascal
    Last edited by Pascal Huysmans; 08-28-2006, 05:48 AM. Reason: Irrelevant to the discussion

    Comment

      #92
      Cholmshield

      Hello Pascal,

      THis whole discussion is about the cholmshield of KBH, not about you or anyone else. Iff i do not believe something then that is the originality of the shield, thats all.

      For me mr. Klietmann has done also good things, as he was one of the nestors of this hobby. That about dr. Klietmann => so if other forummembers does not care about mr. Klietmann then that is fine, but it does not infect my feelings or observations.

      For me this discussion has ended as persons are beginning to take things the bad (personal) way and the shield in questions is dissapearing out of the focus.

      Cordial greetings + happy collecting,
      my collectionfield : German glider pilots


      http://users.skynet.be/lw-glider/

      Comment

        #93
        Dear moderators and Lifetime Members!!!... and other guys too...
        Instead of receiving qualified opinion of my Cholm I have learned a lot of words about bad people who fake awards.. well, thank you even not to plus me to them! You said no one definitely word of poor quality of my shield! Speak in equivoques may be intresting for you but for me as for person who recently went for Third Reich awards. Moreover I found it disgustingly!

        Sincerely..

        Comment

        Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 template Next

        Users Viewing this Thread

        Collapse

        There is currently 1 user online. 0 members and 1 guests.

        Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.

        Working...
        X