Hi gang,
I have reservations about the sword here
Can you please give me your opinions? Here are my observations:
(1) The Kokura arsenal mark is not -- to my experience -- found on swords but only on bayonets.
(2) The "ho" syllabary, ホ, also is not found on swords.
(3) The tang does not have file marks.
(4) The hole seems a bit far down.
(5) Although the number 十五 painted on the tang matches the "15" on the tsuba [hand guard], it is written with the tang held in the wrong position -- it is upside-down relative to what I've always seen.
(6) The tsuba seems a bit rough around the cut-out areas. This might be a late-war production, but maybe a fake.
More photos on the posted link; here are two examples:
Many thanks,
--Guy
I have reservations about the sword here
Can you please give me your opinions? Here are my observations:
(1) The Kokura arsenal mark is not -- to my experience -- found on swords but only on bayonets.
(2) The "ho" syllabary, ホ, also is not found on swords.
(3) The tang does not have file marks.
(4) The hole seems a bit far down.
(5) Although the number 十五 painted on the tang matches the "15" on the tsuba [hand guard], it is written with the tang held in the wrong position -- it is upside-down relative to what I've always seen.
(6) The tsuba seems a bit rough around the cut-out areas. This might be a late-war production, but maybe a fake.
More photos on the posted link; here are two examples:
Many thanks,
--Guy
Comment