Here I go again with my comparison pictures.
Top picture is your helmet Eric. The vent lugs are very important. This lug appears to have a thin layer of brown painted directly over bare metal. Again, there's no evidence of age to the paint. I have already discussed my concerns about the wear to the camo, but I would add that the paint itself looks utterly wrong. It looks new with no signs of age. I also find the way it's been applied totally unconvincing.
Bottom picture is a detail of another E.T. 64, this time an M18 with remarkably well preserved thickly applied camo. Even though the paint is nearly mint, it still shows wear from handling and laying it on its top in that the brush stokes have been rubbed smooth in certain areas. The few chips the camo paint does have shows nothing but aged bare metal - no clear signs of Feldgrau paint - until you look at the bottom edge of the helmet and the damaged areas of the vent lugs. The lug steps show lighter discolouration from dust and dirt collected over the decades.
Top picture is your helmet Eric. The vent lugs are very important. This lug appears to have a thin layer of brown painted directly over bare metal. Again, there's no evidence of age to the paint. I have already discussed my concerns about the wear to the camo, but I would add that the paint itself looks utterly wrong. It looks new with no signs of age. I also find the way it's been applied totally unconvincing.
Bottom picture is a detail of another E.T. 64, this time an M18 with remarkably well preserved thickly applied camo. Even though the paint is nearly mint, it still shows wear from handling and laying it on its top in that the brush stokes have been rubbed smooth in certain areas. The few chips the camo paint does have shows nothing but aged bare metal - no clear signs of Feldgrau paint - until you look at the bottom edge of the helmet and the damaged areas of the vent lugs. The lug steps show lighter discolouration from dust and dirt collected over the decades.
Comment