In my opinion Jim's cross has the earliest (and more common) three-piece award-type 1813 frame, but with well-worn beading.
That is interesting. Mine has the same core and frame as Jims. I also have a letter
from D. Niemann describing it as an "early" piece yet for the longest time we have
been told that the skinny framed crosses were the "awarded" crosses and that these
crosses with the wider frames were from the second (1835?) issuing.
That is interesting. Mine has the same core and frame as Jims. I also have letter
from D. Niemann describing it as an "early" piece yet for the longest time we have
been told that the skinny framed crosses were the "awarded" crosses and that these
crosses with the wider frames were from the second issuing.
Greg ,,such stories are all idiotic assumptions just to fill in research gabs born in amateur way of looking at history .
those Germans could not read they're own historic period books ,,or combine it with found crosses and technical understanding of the craftsmanship.
therefore never cover or link the right historic events to examples found in collector hand
let alone make a decent time framing of what they held in hand
this frame is the early lesser damaged example of a 1813 frame used up tho the 1870's.
wide frames are used and issued right from the start of 1813.
wideness of the frame was not a theme or concern to the producers nor initiators of the Iron cross 1813
especially schinkel knew that.. and Schneider ,,but hey ,,,so far nobody cares .
besides the experimental frame's ,,, 5/6 distinctive frame changes early from 1813 appeared to let the final design to be what it became ..up to 1957.
those changes covered wide and narrow frames .
Comment