I think in alot of areas of collecting, a little faith in some items is required. I think we have all come across an item or two that have fallen into grey areas. I think the bottom line is, if an individual is happy with an item in his collection, then who are we to oppose that?
Now, if you want to write a reference book or COA, you should have some proof to back up any claims. I don't know what Detlev would be able to prove in this situation. An individual could buy this item and later some piece of solid evidence, such as a period catalouge, picture or similar piece with provenance will surface and prove he has an extremly rare example. Or, it could turn out to be something else. A period modification by the recipient (good) or a modern modification done to decieve (bad). Who knows? We're all speculating here for the most part.
Now, if you want to write a reference book or COA, you should have some proof to back up any claims. I don't know what Detlev would be able to prove in this situation. An individual could buy this item and later some piece of solid evidence, such as a period catalouge, picture or similar piece with provenance will surface and prove he has an extremly rare example. Or, it could turn out to be something else. A period modification by the recipient (good) or a modern modification done to decieve (bad). Who knows? We're all speculating here for the most part.
Comment