Holster

[patrick99]

Gentlemen,

Please reply on this gun holster

<a href="http://s1052.photobucket.com/albums/s453/PatrickS99/?action=view&amp;current=DSC001002.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://i1052.photobucket.com/albums/s453/PatrickS99/DSC001002.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket"></a>

<a href="http://s1052.photobucket.com/albums/s453/PatrickS99/?action=view&amp;current=DSC001003.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://i1052.photobucket.com/albums/s453/PatrickS99/DSC001003.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket"></a>

<a href="http://s1052.photobucket.com/albums/s453/PatrickS99/?action=view&amp;current=DSC001004.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://i1052.photobucket.com/albums/s453/PatrickS99/DSC001004.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket"></a>

<a href="http://s1052.photobucket.com/albums/s453/PatrickS99/?action=view&amp;current=DSC001006.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://i1052.photobucket.com/albums/s453/PatrickS99/DSC001006.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket"></a>

[FestungSpanien]

There's something I don't like about this holster...I would pass on it if you are looking to buy it.

[Jørn Schmidt]

Looks wrong to me also,the leather looks very thick,also stiching
on the beltloops,is it dated 1955?

Cheers
J.S

[IanC]

I too would pass on this.

As Jørn has mentioned, the stitching on the belt loops is very strange.

If it is dated 1935, then I don't think it should have the P08 designation as I believe this came later.

Also it looks like this holster has had a hard life yet the stitching, at least from the photo's looks white?

[Michael Kuligowski]

it surely is not a 1935 Sindel holster... poor fake that was run thru washing machine.. few times...

[patrick99]

Thanks guys.