Warning: session_start(): open(/var/cpanel/php/sessions/ea-php74/sess_50603f6abffd782c538f5d271ef8ad40f783e283461350bc, O_RDWR) failed: No space left on device (28) in /home/devwehrmacht/public_html/forums/includes/vb5/frontend/controller/page.php on line 71 Warning: session_start(): Failed to read session data: files (path: /var/cpanel/php/sessions/ea-php74) in /home/devwehrmacht/public_html/forums/includes/vb5/frontend/controller/page.php on line 71 Unmarked Deschler skull - Wehrmacht-Awards.com Militaria Forums
BunkerMilitaria

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Unmarked Deschler skull

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
    #1

    Unmarked Deschler skull

    Hi,

    would be glad about your opinion on this skull.

    I am asking bit susbicious about the way the prongs are fixed on the back?

    Thank you
    Attached Files
    Tags: None
    #2
    For me this is not a Deschler way connecting technology.
    A learge solder amount is visible on the back.
    By the way IMO its not possible to proof this skull as Deschler or orginal period made skull if this skull is ,,second hand".(not found by you)
    Peter
    Last edited by Funia; 09-25-2019, 07:35 AM.

    Comment

      #3
      Look at the teeth ... this is not a Deschler skull.


      Ian.

      Comment

        #4
        Hi,

        direct link to the current lot 40-744 of Ratisbons 31.

        https://www.ratisbons.com/31st-Conte...cap-skull.html

        The skull is not identified as a Deschler model on the lot presentation.

        Pictures courtesy of Ratisbons.

        See You

        Vince
        Attached Files

        Comment

          #5
          Does not look like solder to me, it's probably epoxy resin.

          Comment

            #6
            Thank you guys. For me it looked familiar to Deschler.
            That's why I was wondering about the prongs setup

            So it seems to be something that can not be identified?

            Comment

              #7
              Hi,

              as best, the skull is "strange", at worse it is a fake casted one.

              See You

              Vince

              Comment

                #8
                Originally posted by FrenchVolunteer View Post
                Hi,

                as best, the skull is "strange", at worse it is a fake casted one.

                See You

                Vince
                Thank you. What ever it is, I will keep my hands of.

                Thank you all again

                Comment

                  #9
                  I dunno, don't pretend to know it all , but the patina on the backside would be difficult to fake IMO

                  Comment

                    #10
                    In a recent thread, where other "unmarked chler" impoluted in the "nickel silver finish spray" came out, has anyone made comparisons ??? That would be the original aspect of this, before taking that "dificult to fake" patina ???????

                    Comment

                      #11
                      Looks like somebody added SS runes in pencil or something in back [top center].

                      Comment

                        #12
                        Unmarked,weak in details and no proof to Deschler

                        Comment

                        Previous template Next

                        Users Viewing this Thread

                        Collapse

                        There are currently 2 users online. 0 members and 2 guests.

                        Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.

                        Working...
                        X