Ratisbons

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

SS Skull by Deshler Good or Bad?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    SS Skull by Deshler Good or Bad?

    2ed pattern Scull dose it have enough detail.....to be original..? Thanks in advance.
    Attached Files

    #2
    more
    Attached Files

    Comment


      #3
      fdvfvfevfvfv
      Attached Files

      Comment


        #4
        Look at the teeth ... that's not a Deschler skull.

        Ian

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by Ian Hulley View Post
          Look at the teeth ... that's not a Deschler skull.

          Ian
          Thanks Ian....! Any other opinions...? It was sold to me as an unmarked Deschler....

          Comment


            #6
            This is the unmarked, so-called, (probably mistakenly), the "unmarked Deschler".
            There are mixed opinions on these, and I am still very skeptical of these due to how common they are, to be such an early variation. I have not added one to my collection, but you must decide for yourself, as this one may be unresolved at this time, imo.

            Anyway, these are my thoughts,

            Chris

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by sscollector View Post
              this is the unmarked, so-called, (probably mistakenly), the "unmarked deschler".
              There are mixed opinions on these, and i am still very skeptical of these due to how common they are, to be such an early variation. I have not added one to my collection, but you must decide for yourself, as this one may be unresolved at this time, imo.

              Anyway, these are my thoughts,

              chris
              +1

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by SScollector View Post
                This is the unmarked, so-called, (probably mistakenly), the "unmarked Deschler".
                There are mixed opinions on these, and I am still very skeptical of these due to how common they are, to be such an early variation. I have not added one to my collection, but you must decide for yourself, as this one may be unresolved at this time, imo.

                Anyway, these are my thoughts,

                Chris
                Great Imfo....thanks very much Chris...!

                Comment


                  #9
                  Based on this pics IMO this skull it's not period WW2 skull.
                  For sure patina it's not natural.
                  Someone aged this skull.If someone aged for me skull is not orginal.
                  Also alloy used to made this skull and soft detail of ,,face''and improper malocclusion(simply production muff) and more other things are proof for me skull it's post war copy .
                  But the most important key to recognize it's this not natural patina.(as I wrote previously)
                  Summary for me no doubt-this skull is bad
                  Peter

                  Comment

                  Users Viewing this Thread

                  Collapse

                  There is currently 1 user online. 0 members and 1 guests.

                  Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.

                  Working...
                  X