I've researching this one for the last day....I believe it's a good one.
Like to hear opinions from others in the community.
Many Thanks!
Howard
Like to hear opinions from others in the community.
Many Thanks!
Howard
-
-
More photos. the brown stuff is caked on dirt. -
....Comment
-
...Comment
-
........Comment
-
last pic
Thanks again for the help.
On pg 149 of Bando's S.S. book an example matches almost perfectly.Comment
-
Irrespective of that photo in the Beaver/Bando (which is different anyway) I find the subject uninspiring and the spotlessly clean black highlights and dried mud on it particularly fake looking.
Could just be me ...
IanComment
-
Thanks Ian.Originally posted by Ian Hulley View Post
Disagree with you on the mud/soiling. In my experience if an item is sewn to a uniform........the back of the insignia is not dirty.
I've owned hundreds of Vietnam patches that were worn in country, exposed sides are filthy whiile the backside are nice an clean.
Cheers,
HowardComment
-
Howard, did you check for an 'unterlagen' first?Comment
-
Not sure what you are asking?Originally posted by Disco Partisan View Post
There is a cardboard templete under the bullion. No glow under blacklight.
Best,
HowardComment
-
Original eagle.
Bob HritzIn the land of the blind, the one eyed man is king.
Duct tape can't fix stupid, but it can muffle the sound.Comment
-
As Bob said it is an Original ...at least it's an original style. The mud is puzzling but my Cavalry officer tunic had some caked mud on it.Comment
-
Thank you Bob!Originally posted by Bob Hritz View Post
I was hoping you would chime in An share your knowlegde.
Thanks for your help.
Best Regards,
HowardComment
-
-
And the tag is also original on the back what makes sense. And not so easy to find with its original blk silk tag.Comment
Comment