Sturmmann MG42 combat soldier waffen SS "Heinz Meager"

[MountainMan]

noooooooo i just dont get this. If you have some crap and you dont know it fine.....for this you get help here to find it out, noone offend anyone. But then just write.....i dont responde anymore close the thread..i know its original....well my Daughter responde like this...when she dont get here new Doll or she have to eat what she dont like....but a grown up Man....

This is getting intense!!!

- Jeremy

[Snni]

[Buckliger]

..as I said from the very first moment... et viola
...it is exact the same fake material than this egg here imo....http://www.ebay.de/itm/311318308339?...%3AMEBIDX%3AIT
Never buy the story of an item, buy just the facts....
As said. it s not even a fake, it s just a repro...
it is a nice ensemble, but the wrapper has not even a chance

[Rogerd]

Sad....
In staid of sticking your head in the sand, return the jacket to the one who sold it to you as an original!

In plaats van hier boos te worden om de commentaren zou je eigenlijk de man moeten contacteren die je dit jasje verkocht als origineel ! Want het is inderdaad een volledige fake, de wol is zelfs niet origineel! Ook helemaal fout in elkaar gezet. Het is helemaal geen goed gemaakte fake! Enkel de adelaar is een originele...

Men probeert je hier alleen maar te helpen en alle kopers op het waf te beschermen. Dit is de bedoeling van een forum... Als dit jasje origineel was zou je zeker positieve commentaren gehad hebben.

Dat je kwaad bent is te begrijpen, maar wees kwaad op de persoon die je dit verkocht...

[markus]

Ok guys please webmaster remove.


I don't need to sell the configuration as I have.

I will put it back to my 11 Waffen SS figures I own in same quality Of Heinz Meager. Camo.

(...)

....I would like to see the other 10 figures of the same 'quality'....or maybe better not...,no, no,...just kiddin', leave them where they are please!

[Buckliger]

I don t know what assures you so much it was worn by Maeger himself but I assume somebody burned you. By the way, didn t Maeger serve in an infantry unit... a tank wrapper is very uncommon in a infantry unit...

[MM1985]

It's not even a good fake but for 100 € it was at least a cheap fake.

[NickG]

I don t know what assures you so much it was worn by Maeger himself but I assume somebody burned you. By the way, didn t Maeger serve in an infantry unit... a tank wrapper is very uncommon in a infantry unit...

I guess a half track MG42 gunner in a mechanized infantry unit could have worn a field gray wrapper and staying with his vehicle dressed in a wrapper,
while dropping off infantry troops, those dressed in regular uniforms, but this is an infantry MG impression that is being offered and the red assault gunner piping would be out of place...

Btw more on Maeger here...

http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtop...?f=50&t=179572

(turns out the famous soldier in the photos is actually most likely another guy who is named in this thread, Maeger some claim not even participating in the Ardennes...(was wounded, served later as a non combatant sani...). Who knows? The famous Ardennes MG gunner did wear a US captured poncho over his standard SS uniform
(and no helmet cover, nor binos btw, so the impression is not very accurate, but still cool looking albeit the questionable wrapper)!

[Glenn McInnes]

I know it's original, so it's an endless discussion.

You have got to be joking?






Glenn

[Palmenmuster]

It would be nice if you would post some pictures of the SS Parka, it looks promising, and the helmet cover deserves some pictures, might as well be a good one.
Tom

[Vancharger]

just wondering

Is it me or is it time to get a hall of fame for fabulous named uniforms here? Heinz Meager, Gertrud Rabestein, who will be next?

[Winkelman]

This is getting intense!!!

- Jeremy

.

[Ian Hulley]

Is it me or is it time to get a hall of fame for fabulous named FAKE uniforms here? Heinz Meager, Gertrud Rabestein, who will be next?

There, I corrected that for you

Cheers, Ian.

[KM-NZ]

Phoef all over again ....

[jürgen]

Is it sold?

:-)