The more I look at it the more I see differences from known originals.
The colour etc.. is off, which I initially put down to age and whatever
treatment it has had from being backed and the coating / lacquer that
it appears to have over it.
It still has a chance imo, although I wouldn't pay peanuts for it like it is.
Definitely looks shiny - the paper doesn't look correct, either?
It looks like quite a bit of hair or other grime has stuck
to the paper or was sealed in with whatever it was treated with
as you can see some pieces across both the poster and the backing.
Definitely differences in the details of the artwork too!
It looks like quite a bit of hair or other grime has stuck
to the paper or was sealed in with whatever it was treated with
as you can see some pieces across both the poster and the backing.
Definitely differences in the details of the artwork too!
The paper looks like it has excessive amounts of linen or some other type of fragmentation in it which raises red flags for me. The original you posted is what I would expect to see.
The paper looks like it has excessive amounts of linen or some other type of fragmentation in it which raises red flags for me. The original you posted is what I would expect to see.
Perhaps a type of recycled paper used to fool as it does not react to UV Blacklight...
I have seen it before....
Having said that, the grime / particles seem to be over the top of the paper rather
than part of the paper itself as you can clearly see it cross over from poster to the
backing...
Either way, it looks to a poor attempt at preservation.
Differences on the face and helmet would be enough to say no-way in this case.
Comment